The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Among the Stars
Mage Knight: Board Game
Dominion: Dark Ages
Targi
Mice and Mystics
Eclipse
Ace of Spies
The Big Bang Theory: The Party Game
Thunder Road
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Virgin Queen
Lords of Waterdeep
Omen: A Reign of War
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
1984: Animal Farm
Android: Netrunner
Dominion
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Village
Fantastiqa
Pirate Dice: Voyage on the Rolling Seas
Twilight Struggle
Eselsbrücke
The New Science
Hawaii
Nefarious
Kingdom Builder
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Vegas
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Agricola
7 Wonders
Arkham Horror
Ora et Labora
Quarriors! Quarmageddon
War of the Ring
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Glory to Rome
Hemloch
K2
Trajan
Zombicide
Gladiatori
The Castles of Burgundy
Tammany Hall
Dominant Species
Terrain Game
Race for the Galaxy
Skyline

GBoH: Taking it from the top

This blog is to chronicle my playthrough of my Great battles of History collection in mostly chronological order.
Recommend
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up

The missing start

Ryan Powers
United States
Marble
Minnesota
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Chariots of Fire opens up with two of what I consider learning scenarios. Sumer and Sekmem. I didn't do session reports for either as to me they didn't seem to warrant it. To cover the entire run though, some mention of them should be made. So I'll put some mini sessions here.

Sumer 2320 BCE:
This battle sees the Akkadian King Sargon facing off against the Sumerian King Lugal-zaggesi. One leader for each side + momentum chits = two activation chits per side. There is a distinct lack of chariots. The sides consist mainly of shock infantry with a few light infantry and a battle wagon thrown in. These forces face each other across the "standard" ancients wide open plain.

The lack of multiple leaders really means you don't get much of a feel for the activation system, just moving and combat. There is one wrinkle however, the kings are "Heroes" as well as commanders so you can have them engage in Heroic Combat.

Essentially the forces closed and proceeded to duke it out, with Sumer taking the worst of it. Despite Sargon being the better hero, the time came to throw Lugal-zaggesi personally into the fray. Figured it was better to lose fast than slow, and with a little luck maybe better yet to not lose at all. Didn't work. Sargon won.

This little scenario wasn't a bad intro to the table look-ups involved in GBoH combat. So for someone new to the system it might be a good start. For someone already familiar with GBoH combat there's not much to it. Though it does give an opportunity to see how the Men of Iron-style routs and retreats work to a small degree.


Sekmem 1870 BCEThis sees Pharaoh Senusret III of Egypt's XIIth Dynasty moving to seize the trade route city of Sekmem from the Canaanites. Still no chariots, but now we get multiple leaders per side as each has a shock wing and a missile wing of infantry. The Canaanites actually setup inside of the city and have to march out, so it's a bit of a meeting engagement as well.

As I was in a hurry to get to actual chariots by this point and I wasn't planning on writing this one up my notes consist of

Quote:
Egypt wins


Very thorough of me. I sadly don't recall much else from it either.
Twitter Facebook
3 Comments
Subscribe sub options Wed Dec 7, 2011 9:45 pm
Post Comment
Jon Williamson
Canada
Calgary
AB
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Finally got this onto the table in March.

First up was Sumer, which ended in an Akkadian victory as in your session. My thoughts are like yours; it is a fine intro scenario for folks not used to CoF or even GBoH. In my case, it was a bit of both since it has been some time since I played any GBoH.

Currently, Sekmum is on the table and it is a reasonable step up from Sumer given that it has multiple commands to activate on each side. Thus far, the Egyptians are doing well, but their Shock Infantry was shot up pretty well by the Canaanite bowmen and slingers. Not that that stopped the Egyptians mind you, but now they face a line of Canaanite SI who, unlike the Egyptians, are at full TQ. Not sure how this is going to turn out.

I am enjoying myself and have noticed a few things here and there. One is the apparent strength of the aggressor in Shock Combat. They can often plow into the fight without needing the "must" TQ check. Not so the defender, who must roll (d10)and, if they fail, must take Result-TQ hits. Nasty! Considering most SI to date are at TQ "5" or "4" (some are "6"), there is a very good chance that they will fail the roll and be at a disadvantage before the spears start-a-flying.

Meanwhile, I am eying my first chariot battle...I am thinking Astarpa River since there are no Runner Infantry and it is on a flat plain.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Apr 3, 2012 8:00 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Ryan Powers
United States
Marble
Minnesota
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Capt_S wrote:


Meanwhile, I am eying my first chariot battle...I am thinking Astarpa River since there are no Runner Infantry and it is on a flat plain.


The absence of RI in that one nicely highlights the differences of two vs three man chariots. The lack of RI makes pass-though easier and keeps things nice and fluid throughout. I'd love to hear how it goes when you give it a shot.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Apr 3, 2012 8:22 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Jon Williamson
Canada
Calgary
AB
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Shall do.

I have a funny feeling the Egyptians are going to lose at Sekmum. All depends on this upcoming SI vs SI shock combat round. Mind you, they are the attackers currently so the Canaanite SI will be taking some TQ hits right off the bat.

I am enjoying this battle more than I thought I would, which just whets my appetite more for the increasingly complex chariot encounters.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Apr 3, 2012 9:12 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote

Subscribe

Contributors

Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.