Perikles Attack Summary Sheet.pdf (113 KB) (Log in or Register to download.)
I found the Battle Summary posted by Craig Kloosterman (spaceygamer) very useful and decided to post it in graphical terms that made it easier for those who (like me) find graphics easier to understand and employ during games.
A small suggestion: since your battle summary is for a Trireme preliminary round followed by a Hoplite deciding round, why not use a battle tile that shows this, instead of the Mantinea tile that is a single Hoplite deciding round instead.
Time to perform this only. I will work on it as this same idea came to me as I pondered how I can improve this player aid. I wanted to capture all possible outcomes so it would be used to referee games to those unfamiliar with the battle scene in Perikles.
Welcome baby brother Toby James, 03/24, 8 lb. 15 oz.
Very nice summary. It helped me visualize and remember it much better in this format.
Some suggestions if you update the file:
1) You are missing your attacking units in the 6th example: "Attacker Trireme & Hoplite and no Defenders."
2) I reiterate what 37 said above - show a tile that has trireme -> hoplite battle.
The nit-picks (but all constructive!)
3) I would be consistent with Attacker first then Defender second on your titles (I relize you were just using what Craig used orginally) but it would be better to have the 3rd example state "No Attackers and Defender Trireme"
4) Instead of "no other units" I would spell out "No Attackers" or "No Defenders"
5) Example 9 has the Defender hoplite outlined in red when everything else is in a black outline.
6) Example 13 make the "red 2" black (as red is associated with influence cubes in your examples). Likewise, in examples 14, 15, and 16, I would make "Battle Token" bold like you did in this example.
7) Examples 13, and 16, I would make "tile" the "Location Tile for VPs" and colroed green to be consistent.
8) In the last row on the last page, I'd put the 16th example first with the general notes in the 3rd column. (OK, this one is less constructive and more preference!)
