$18.00
GeekGold Bonus for All Supporters: 125.47

7,470 Supporters

$15 min for supporter badge & GeekGold bonus
47.1% of Goal | left

Support:

fightcitymayor
United States
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania
flag msg tools
Proprietor and Chairman Emeritus of The Naughty Palace
mb
http://reason.com/blog/2016/09/16/debate-commission-blocks-g...

Next question: Who is there in power that can bring Johnson and/or Stein to the front-door of these debates and demand to be let in? Because there is a not-so-veiled threat which I've bolded in red.

Gary Johnson wrote:
I would say I am surprised that the CPD has chosen to exclude me from the first debate, but I'm not. After all, the Commission is a private organization created 30 years ago by the Republican and Democratic parties for the clear purpose of taking control of the only nationally-televised presidential debates voters will see. At the time of its creation, the leaders of those two parties made no effort to hide the fact that they didn't want any third party intrusions into their shows.

The only time a third candidate has been allowed on the stage was 1992, when both parties wanted him on the stage for their own purposes. It should be noted that, when Perot was allowed on the stage, polls showed his support to be in single digits, below where Johnson and Weld are currently polling.

The CPD may scoff at a ticket that enjoys "only" 9 or 10% in their hand-selected polls, but even 9% represents 13 million voters, more than the total population of Ohio and most other states. Yet, the Republicans and Democrats are choosing to silence the candidate preferred by those millions of Americans.

Americans are tired of rigged systems, and the monopoly on debates created by the CPD is a prime and skillfully executed example.

Bill Weld and I will continue to fight to provide a voice and an alternative for independents, disenfranchised Republicans and Democrats, Millennials and others who aren't satisfied with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton as their options.

It is unfortunate that the CPD doesn't believe such a voice should be heard. There are more polls and more debates, and we plan to be on the debate stage in October.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
jeremy cobert
United States
cedar rapids
Iowa
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
bummer, having all four democrats on stage would have been epic !
8 
 Thumb up
0.01
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Les Marshall
United States
Woodinville
Washington
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
jeremycobert wrote:
bummer, having all four democrats on stage would have been epic !


Jeremy you should run for labeler in chief since you seem to be such an expert....and it seems so important to you.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Frank F
United States
Texas
flag msg tools
IF YOU WANT IT
badge
Please investigate a resource based economy.
mbmbmbmbmb
The monetary system only ever offers you two choices, bad and worse. You have no genuine options.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
True Blue Jon
United States
Vancouver
Washington
flag msg tools
designer
mbmbmbmbmb
Nader wasn't even allowed in the building.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Drew
United States
North Dakota
flag msg tools
Thanks for the rent-free space in your head. Would have been nice if you'd cleaned it up a bit before you rented it out, though.
badge
I control your mind.
mbmbmbmbmb
jeremycobert wrote:
bummer, having all four democrats on stage would have been epic !


Surely three Democrats and a Commie. Although Democrats look more like Commies these days, so I understand your confusion.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Robert Wesley
Nepal
Aberdeen
Washington
flag msg tools
designer
mb
surprise They should hold their OWN here in Geek Chat during this other "ongoing" and we'll compare notes upon WHATEVER were 'addressed' instead of their "publaloblob-pablum" and 'HardBIGballs'-query, so we can determine WHOM had the UTMOST "biggiest-MAN-hands"
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Corey Hopkins
United States
Converse
Indiana
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
I think there should be one debate with all serious candidates (on the ballot in enough states to get to 270).

But only one. I think it is reasonable and logical to spend the majority of the time and questions on the candidates that can actually win.

*ducks*
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Ari
United States
California
flag msg tools
La vie est un jeu
badge
Panem et Circenses
mbmbmbmbmb
flamespeak wrote:
chopkins828 wrote:
I think there should be one debate with all serious candidates (on the ballot in enough states to get to 270).

But only one. I think it is reasonable and logical to spend the majority of the time and questions on the candidates that can actually win.

*ducks*


I think it should just be a cage match to the death.
ONLY THE STRONG SHALL LEAD!
Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho

1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Boaty McBoatface
England
County of Essex
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
If only there was some system of (Ohh I do not know lets call it society) that took power out of the hands or private bodies so as to make it fair for all, damn it why does know such system exist.

But yrs, given how many people hate the two main candidates) for once they should be there.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Chris
United States
Sandy Springs
Georgia
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Lol, it's almost like you think a third party matters.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Boaty McBoatface
England
County of Essex
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
galad2003 wrote:
Lol, it's almost like you think a third party matters.
No, I just believe in informed democracy. I dislike the way the major parties act like they are the only choice we get to chose (yes it is the same in the UK, we just have three of them).
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
David Hoffman
United States
Briarcliff Manor
New York
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Well, neither Stein nor Johnson has any chance of being elected. Including them in the debate with Clinton and Trump would only take time away from the two actual candidates. It's nice to be informed and all that, but isn't it more important to be informed about people who might have a chance of actually being elected?
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Boaty McBoatface
England
County of Essex
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
ohbalto wrote:
Well, neither Stein nor Johnson has any chance of being elected. Including them in the debate with Clinton and Trump would only take time away from the two actual candidates. It's nice to be informed and all that, but isn't it more important to be informed about people who might have a chance of actually being elected?
Except this time I am not so sure that is true. Sure it is very unlikely, but it's not impossible (given how odious the two main candidates are) that we could see an upset.

1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
G Rowls
msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
That's Hilary apparently as according to legit sources - she is already dead.

You cannot kill what does not live!
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
10/₆
United States
Round Rock
Texas
flag msg tools
"Sometimes, the dark side overcomes what Lincoln called the better angels of our nature"
mb
The debates are going to be nothing but a mud slinging circus. I think Johnson is better off not wallowing in that mire.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Christopher Bird
Canada
Toronto
Ontario
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
slatersteven wrote:
Sure it is very unlikely, but it's not impossible (given how odious the two main candidates are) that we could see an upset.


No, it's impossible. About 75% of the electorate is completely and unshakably locked into their vote at this point, and Johnson and Stein are only polling as well as they have because neither has had to actually seriously compete. In a debate Clinton waxes either of them without trying hard (and as much as I loathe Trump I think his brand of dominance politics would work well against both), because most of the flirting-with-Johnson voters don't know most of his positions - like, seriously, the guy wants to raise Social Security eligibility to *72*, that's a rock-solid model for getting 2% of the vote - and because Stein advocates for a lot of woo-woo things and has said an incredible amount of dumb shit, and because it's easy to look like a viable Presidential candidate when nobody's campaigning against you.

We've already seen other candidates with the political skill of Johnson and Stein this year. They were all gone by the end of the third primary.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Junior McSpiffy
United States
Riverton
Utah
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
mightygodking wrote:
slatersteven wrote:
Sure it is very unlikely, but it's not impossible (given how odious the two main candidates are) that we could see an upset.


No, it's impossible. About 75% of the electorate is completely and unshakably locked into their vote at this point, and Johnson and Stein are only polling as well as they have because neither has had to actually seriously compete. In a debate Clinton waxes either of them without trying hard (and as much as I loathe Trump I think his brand of dominance politics would work well against both), because most of the flirting-with-Johnson voters don't know most of his positions - like, seriously, the guy wants to raise Social Security eligibility to *72*, that's a rock-solid model for getting 2% of the vote - and because Stein advocates for a lot of woo-woo things and has said an incredible amount of dumb shit, and because it's easy to look like a viable Presidential candidate when nobody's campaigning against you.

We've already seen other candidates with the political skill of Johnson and Stein this year. They were all gone by the end of the third primary.



And, of course, the "ownage" would only happen in one direction, right? Would some of their flaws get exposed? Sure. But Hillary and Trump both have flaws of mammoth proportions. But why doesn't anyone take them seriously? Because "But the other guy is worse" is the new "Abra Kadabra" where saying it makes things disappear.

Why don't any of Hillary's supporters have serious qualms about her ethical shortcomings? Because Trump. Why don't any of Trump's supporters have serious qualms about his total inexperience in governing? Because Hillary. The very act of him being on stage would add a legitimacy that would give an alternative that people either didn't know about or consider seriously.

Even if he got crushed in the debates, the very act of being on stage would be enough to get him a massive number of points. But you and your ilk have already pre-decided that a two-term governor isn't qualified to be president and would get dismantled so let's not even bother. And for you, the reason is simple. Because Trump. And if jeremy was to say the same thing, his reason would be Because Hillary.

Fear legitimizing.
3 
 Thumb up
0.02
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Robert Wesley
Nepal
Aberdeen
Washington
flag msg tools
designer
mb
'advocate & 'institute' were as 'differing' of in WHAT either/both major Party Legislators already HAVE, and shall repeatedly 'inflict & infect', our very "governing bodies" with their ongoing incompetent maleficence. Perhaps, we required a RESET *Option* beginning with immediate ouster of those 'incumbents' continuing their "disservice of society" through theirs. NONE felt nor believed themselves 'culpable' beyond their VOTE of these into office, since, whenever any had been FOUND 'criminally negligent', why, those that PLACED them into the 'position' initially are not equally as 'responsible'? FELONS 'lose' their RIGHT of 'vote', EXCEPT, apparently, you-all?
shake
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Steven Woodcock
United States
Unspecified
Unspecified
flag msg tools
mb
jeremycobert wrote:
bummer, having all four democrats on stage would have been epic !


More like the opening line to a joke:

"Two Democrats, a Socialist, and a Populist walk into a bar...."



Ferret
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Boaty McBoatface
England
County of Essex
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Ferretman wrote:
jeremycobert wrote:
bummer, having all four democrats on stage would have been epic !


More like the opening line to a joke:

"Two Democrats, a Socialist, and a Populist walk into a bar...."



Ferret
Good, I hoped they all got concussion.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
True Blue Jon
United States
Vancouver
Washington
flag msg tools
designer
mbmbmbmbmb
mightygodking wrote:
slatersteven wrote:
Sure it is very unlikely, but it's not impossible (given how odious the two main candidates are) that we could see an upset.


No, it's impossible. About 75% of the electorate is completely and unshakably locked into their vote at this point, and Johnson and Stein are only polling as well as they have because neither has had to actually seriously compete. In a debate Clinton waxes either of them without trying hard (and as much as I loathe Trump I think his brand of dominance politics would work well against both), because most of the flirting-with-Johnson voters don't know most of his positions - like, seriously, the guy wants to raise Social Security eligibility to *72*, that's a rock-solid model for getting 2% of the vote - and because Stein advocates for a lot of woo-woo things and has said an incredible amount of dumb shit, and because it's easy to look like a viable Presidential candidate when nobody's campaigning against you.

We've already seen other candidates with the political skill of Johnson and Stein this year. They were all gone by the end of the third primary.


If one of them can take just one state, it's not impossible.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Robert Wesley
Nepal
Aberdeen
Washington
flag msg tools
designer
mb
Ferretman wrote:
jeremycobert wrote:
bummer, having all four democrats on stage would have been epic !


More like the opening line to a joke:

"Two Democrats, a Socialist, and a Populist walk into a bar...."



Ferret
slatersteven wrote:
Good, I hoped they all got concussion.
THAT 'required' the actual BRAIN being present for 'susceptible effects', hence they're; "SAFE!"
zombie ~"D`oh! Calls ME 'Starvin` Marvin'!"
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Moshe Callen
Israel
Jerusalem
flag msg tools
designer
ἄνδρα μοι ἔννεπε, μοῦσα, πολύτροπον, ὃς μάλα πολλὰ/ πλάγχθη, ἐπεὶ Τροίης ἱερὸν πτολίεθρον ἔπερσεν./...
badge
μῆνιν ἄειδε θεὰ Πηληϊάδεω Ἀχιλῆος/ οὐλομένην, ἣ μυρί᾽ Ἀχαιοῖς ἄλγε᾽ ἔθηκε,/...
mbmbmbmbmb
quozl wrote:
Nader wasn't even allowed in the building.

Nader was and is a loon.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Christopher Bird
Canada
Toronto
Ontario
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
GameCrossing wrote:
And, of course, the "ownage" would only happen in one direction, right? Would some of their flaws get exposed? Sure. But Hillary and Trump both have flaws of mammoth proportions.


You're creating a false equivalence because my point is: most of Johnson and Stein's support in polling is soft, because they're largely unknown quantities. I mean, former Sanders supporters who are considering Johnson aren't doing it because Sanders and Johnson have anything close to equivalent policy viewpoints.

Trump and Clinton have flaws, sure. Lots of them. But their flaws are largely known. People who support Clinton and Trump know about their flaws already; it's essentially impossible not to do so. Lots of people who support Johnson or Stein don't know that Johnson's compromise position on Social Security is increasing eligibility age to 72, or that he's pro-TPP, or that he opposes minimum wage laws in their entirety, or that he wants to eliminate the estate tax and replace it with a national sales tax. Lots of them don't know that Stein is antivax, or that she has a bonkers plan to eliminate student debt through qualitative easing, or that she's praised Russia's human rights record.

How is Johnson or Stein gonna get up on stage and "own" Hillary? Get up there and say, what, what Trump and tons of conservatives have been saying for months/years/decades? Or is this the magic bit where you decide that Johnson and Stein are secretly policy mavens and wizard public speakers despite a near-total lack of evidence?

Quote:
Why don't any of Hillary's supporters have serious qualms about her ethical shortcomings? Because Trump.


Or because they consider the accusations regarding her ethical shortcomings to be overblown.

Quote:
Why don't any of Trump's supporters have serious qualms about his total inexperience in governing? Because Hillary.


Or because they've decided that his inexperience is actually a plus.

Quote:
Even if he got crushed in the debates, the very act of being on stage would be enough to get him a massive number of points.


Look how well it worked for Ross Perot!

Quote:
But you and your ilk have already pre-decided that a two-term governor isn't qualified to be president


No, the American people as a whole have decided that Johnson (and Jill Stein) isn't worth having in the debates. Gary Johnson and Jill Stein have had over a year apiece to try to convince the American electorate that they should be considered as serious options to the main two parties in a year where the two major parties have chosen candidates who each have remarkably high net-disapproval ratings. They've both had a remarkable amount of press coverage as compared to most third-party candidates - they've each gotten live coverage of multiple events and speeches on major news networks, and Johnson's national ceiling was around eight percent and Stein's less than four.

There's being qualified to do the job of president. There are a lot of people who are qualified to be President, frankly - a lot of smart people with the general intelligence (both analytical and emotional/social), managerial skill and stamina needed for the job. Being qualified for the job of President isn't the same thing as qualifying for a debate, which is a different question entirely: that qualification is about convincing a sufficient number of voters that you deserve to be advertised freely to the wider electorate as someone with a decent chance at becoming President.

Johnson and Stein have each had a year with two of the most unpopular Presidential candidates ever and much more press coverage/free advertising than Libertarian and Green candidates usually get, and they can't crack even two-thirds of the standard requirement to enter a national debate. These two schmucks simply don't make the grade, and I find it hilarious that most of the people complaining about Johnson's non-inclusion are people who usually claim that affirmative action is immoral, because that's what they're advocating for with Johnson - except, of course, that what they're advocating for with Johnson is what they actually imagine affirmative action to be, rather than the reality of what it is.
5 
 Thumb up
0.25
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
1 , 2  Next »   | 
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.