The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Mice and Mystics
Eclipse
Among the Stars
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Thunder Road
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Lords of Waterdeep
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Dungeon Fighter
Virgin Queen
Skyline
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Twilight Struggle
Dominion
Android: Netrunner
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Agricola
The Big Bang Theory: The Party Game
Total War
Arkham Horror
7 Wonders
Village
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Wrong Chemistry
The Castles of Burgundy
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Alien Frontiers
Ora et Labora
Le Havre
Kingdom Builder
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Trajan
Glory to Rome
The Swarm
Race for the Galaxy
Caylus
Battlestar Galactica
Tammany Hall
Small World
Zombicide
Hawaii
Quarriors! Quarmageddon
Power Grid
Space Alert
Recommend
5 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
4 Posts

A House Divided» Forums » Rules

Subject: The rules used at the World Boardgaming Championships rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Iain Cheyne
United Kingdom
Reading
Berkshire
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
There has been quite a bit of discussion here about which rules to use, so I emailed Daniel Broh-Kahn, who ran the two A House Divided tournaments at the World Boardgaming Championship.

Basically, the Advanced rules were used, with no optional rules, unless both players agreed.

There are three session reports at the WBC website:
* 1999
* 2000
* 2001

All the games were 10 turn scenarios.

The "rule of 7", was used to minimize luck: The sum of your marches die roll and your recruiting die roll in a month is always seven. As all scenarios start with a 1 for marches for both sides, things get bloody quickly.

In 1999 and 2000, they tried to follow the campaign game over the rounds - in other words, 1861 for the first round, 1862 in the second round, 1863 in the semis and 1864 in the final.

In 2001 they abandoned this in favour of the 1861 scenario throughout as it had proved the most balanced.

By 2001, there were concerns that the short scenario favoured the Confederates, as they can play suicidally on the last turn:

Quote:
A possible addition to next year's tournament would be a variable ending chit for the scenario, preventing the Confederate player from end-gaming the situation and picking up easy cities with no chance of retaliation, as the Confederate always has the last player turn. In this possible tournament addition, the Confederate player rolls to end the game on turn 9 (33% chance) then again on turn 10 (67% chance) and finally on turn 11 (100% chance).


I'll give this ruleset a try, once we are up to trying the Advanced Rules.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Last edited Tue May 19, 2009 4:29 pm (Total Number of Edits: 1)
  • Posted Tue May 19, 2009 4:26 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • QuickReply
    •  
    • QuickQuote
    •  
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Pete Gelman
United States
Portland
Oregon
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Thanks for posting this.

"With 12 entrants, four expressed a desire to play the North, four desired to play the South, and four had no preference."

***

"Much to the gamemaster's delight, the first six games ended in a balance of wins for each side."

***

"In order to play a balanced scenario worthy of a battle for the championship, both players agreed to forego the proposed 1864 scenario and once again play the 1861 scenario, which had proved to be so balanced in tournament play. Terry took the North and Tom the South, where they had each won before. In an exciting, tension-filled game that came down to the last die roll, Tom Cannon pulled off a victory as the South...
(from the WBC 2000 AHD page linked above)

--The first quote seems like a great complement to the game in general.

The next two quotes seem strong recommendations for the 1861 scenario! And that I think is my biggest take-away from their experience.

Cheers.

1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Donald Acker
China
Suzhou
Jiangsu
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Regarding the rule of 7, how does that take into account the rule that 1's are counted as 2's? Or is this rule absent from the current edition?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Iain Cheyne
United Kingdom
Reading
Berkshire
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I believe the rule of 7 applies just to the dice rolls, so if you roll a 1 for movement, it is converted into a 2, but you still get 6 reinforcements.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.