The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Total War
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Eclipse
Mice and Mystics
Dungeon Fighter
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Lords of Waterdeep
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Libertalia
Android: Netrunner
Virgin Queen
The Lord of the Rings: Nazgul
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Dominion
Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game
Infiltration
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Among the Stars
Twilight Struggle
The Swarm
Agricola
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Goa
7 Wonders
Glory to Rome
Arkham Horror
Village
Ora et Labora
Battles of Westeros: House Baratheon Army Expansion
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Thunder Road
Trajan
Zombicide
The Castles of Burgundy
7 Wonders: Cities
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Skyline
Space Alert
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
City of Horror
Race for the Galaxy
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Kingdom Builder
Le Havre
Battlestar Galactica
Recommend
1 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
4 Posts

Arkham Horror: The Lurker at the Threshold Expansion» Forums » Rules

Subject: Discarding Bound Allies In-Game rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Brian Mc Cabe
United States

Arizona
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
The Lurker calls for any Bound Allies to be placed on the AO's sheet in the event of his awakening, requiring one additional success to remove a doom token.

What about in-game discarding of Bound Allies, such as Duke, William Britton or discarding an ally in order to pass The Stars are Right Rumour? I put it on the sheet. It seems like a cheap way to get out of the penalty for having made the pact in the first place. I also don't discard the pact card so that investigator cannot get a second Bound Ally.

Anyone else?

Brian
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Consensus seems to be that you'd keep the Bound Ally card, yes, and still apply the penalty.

But two things that can get confusing about that:
- what if the investigator with Bound Ally gets devoured after discarding the ally?
- what if they discard the ally, and then another investigator gains the same ally later?

An alternative solution would be to have the bound ally discarded on to the AO sheet, and have them continue to apply their penalty even if that investigator later gets devoured. Slightly nastier, but stops people taking Bound Allies routinely in Quachil games.

(Actually, what does happen in a Quachil game with Lurker? All allies are returned to the box at start of battle, after all. Not that it really matters because you're not going to beat them in a fight anyway, of course.)
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
it's pronounced "em cee crispy"
United Kingdom
Basingstoke
Hampshire
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
apatheticexecutioner wrote:
The Lurker calls for any Bound Allies to be placed on the AO's sheet in the event of his awakening, requiring one additional success to remove a doom token.

What about in-game discarding of Bound Allies, such as Duke, William Britton or discarding an ally in order to pass The Stars are Right Rumour? I put it on the sheet. It seems like a cheap way to get out of the penalty for having made the pact in the first place. I also don't discard the pact card so that investigator cannot get a second Bound Ally.

Anyone else?

Brian
I'm with you on this Brian. It's the existance of the Pact that causes the taint that makes it harder to defeat the AO, not the presence of an Ally. So regardless of the status of the Ally when the AO awakens, the Pact had been made so the Bound Ally card must be on the AO sheet to indicate that you are tainted.

I assume that your sentence "it seems like a cheap way..." meant "Otherwise it seems like a cheap way...". I would agree with you, for the reasons that I stated in the previous paragraph.

Again, you are right to retain the Pact card because it indates the existance of a Pact, not the presence of an Ally. The Pact is unaffected by the status of the Ally. Retain the Pact card.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Brian Mc Cabe
United States

Arizona
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I didn't like that one sentence when I wrote it. Discarding the ally to the bottom of the ally deck, rather than putting it on the AO sheet, seems like a cheap way of getting out of paying the penalty would have been better.

Brian

1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.