The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Total War
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Eclipse
Mice and Mystics
Dungeon Fighter
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Lords of Waterdeep
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Libertalia
Android: Netrunner
Virgin Queen
The Lord of the Rings: Nazgul
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Dominion
Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game
Infiltration
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Among the Stars
Twilight Struggle
The Swarm
Agricola
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Goa
7 Wonders
Glory to Rome
Arkham Horror
Village
Ora et Labora
Battles of Westeros: House Baratheon Army Expansion
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Thunder Road
Trajan
Zombicide
The Castles of Burgundy
7 Wonders: Cities
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Skyline
Space Alert
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
City of Horror
Race for the Galaxy
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Kingdom Builder
Le Havre
Battlestar Galactica
Recommend
6 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
3 Posts

Modern Art» Forums » Sessions

Subject: Modern Art in the classroom rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Martin B
China
Jiading
Shanghai
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
This is my fourth ...in the classroom session report. I'm teaching a class called “Closed System Economics” at Shanghai University as an elective for second and third year university students in China. All my students have various business type majors. None of them knew that the class was going to be about board games when they signed up, in fact with the Chinese translation of the title they thought it was going to be a historical lecture about North Korea.

My class format is to show video reviews / tutorials for them to figure out roughly how to play. I also hand out rules summaries to every student so they all have them for reference. This is something that I've learned to do, in the first few sessions I gave one set of rules per group and I've found that giving them to every student really helps with the understanding. They have to write two session reports for games we've played over the course and produce their own video review for the final exam.

You can see my session reports for the other games played previously in the course. They are For Sale, Saboteur, and Container.

After a short lecture at the beginning of class about how things were going I showed the students the two videos on Modern Art. These videos are fast paced flash animated videos which I knew were above the students English level. The positive thing about them was that they had lots of text too, not just speaking which does help. I then handed out the copies of Modern Art.

Set-up went pretty well and all the students managed to get their starting money and starting hand of cards. We went over the different auction mechanics but it seemed that just about every group was unsure about how to start the game. I came to realize that they didn't know what the value of the paintings were. The first time you're playing in the beginning when you don't know about the game it gets a bit daunting to figure out what to buy or sale. I encouraged them along, promising that it would all become clear after the first round.

The first round definitely took much longer than any other. No one knew if they wanted the round to end and what the benefit of ending a round was. One group even called me over saying that one student won the game because she had bought each of the five paintings. Once there was an ending and I showed each group about the value of the paintings based on the number sold I started to see the wheels turn, strategy wheels.

The next moment of strategic discovery came when they realized, after round two, that you add the previous rounds values to the current rounds three highest paintings. Then the money started to really flow.

I got the impression that they liked the game and I wished we had enough time to give it another go but it ended right about the same time that class was over.

It's harder for me to assess how the different strategies of the five groups played out because it is a more difficult game to observe and see what is happening in the overall picture. Each value board looked very different by the end but that was to be expected with random card deals and different players. I didn't get a total money for each group but I do know they wrote them down for their session reports.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Craig Smuda
United States
Chicago
Illinois
So, uh, what were the teaching points here? Do you do some sort of economic/psychometric model of valuation following the games?
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Bryan Jensen
United States
Layton
Utah
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
csmuda wrote:
So, uh, what were the teaching points here? Do you do some sort of economic/psychometric model of valuation following the games?


It appears it was to illustrate the psychology of value within closed (zero-sum) systems.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.