Wilderness roads ambiguities -- now with images! | Inca Empire

François Haffner

(Haffner)

France
Pierre-Bénite
Rhône - Rhône-Alpes

gatish wrote:

Agree with Thomas!

Me too! This solution is unambiguous, easy to explain and apply. I adopt it.

Posted Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:20 am
- Choose your Dice
  - d4
  - d6
  - d8
  - d10
  - d12
  - d20
  - d100
  - Help
  - Roll
  - Comment (Optional)
- QuickReply
- QuickQuote
- Reply
- Quote

J C Lawrence

(clearclaw)

United States
Campbell
California

My specific interpretation is that roads must:

-- Be on a dotted line

Or:

-- Entirely surrounded by dotted lines on all sides.

As such all coastal and forest-side roads are illegal.

Additionally:

- At least one end of any road must be in a conquered territory.

- A road may not cross more than one territory boundary.

- A road may not cross another road (or dotted line).

Last edited Tue May 15, 2012 1:29 am (Total Number of Edits: 2)
Posted Tue May 15, 2012 1:28 am
- Choose your Dice
  - d4
  - d6
  - d8
  - d10
  - d12
  - d20
  - d100
  - Help
  - Roll
  - Comment (Optional)
- QuickReply
- QuickQuote
- Reply
- Quote

(garygarison)

Eugene
Oregon

clearclaw wrote:

As such all coastal and forest-side roads are illegal.

If Mr. Ernstein is still reading this thread, I'd be interested to hear whether this was the original ruling in Tahuantinsuyu.

Posted Tue May 15, 2012 1:47 am
- Choose your Dice
  - d4
  - d6
  - d8
  - d10
  - d12
  - d20
  - d100
  - Help
  - Roll
  - Comment (Optional)
- QuickReply
- QuickQuote
- Reply
- Quote

Inca Empire» Forums » Rules

Subject: Wilderness roads ambiguities -- now with images!