The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Mice and Mystics
Eclipse
Among the Stars
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Thunder Road
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Lords of Waterdeep
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Dungeon Fighter
Virgin Queen
Skyline
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Twilight Struggle
Dominion
Android: Netrunner
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Agricola
The Big Bang Theory: The Party Game
Total War
Arkham Horror
7 Wonders
Village
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Wrong Chemistry
The Castles of Burgundy
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Alien Frontiers
Ora et Labora
Le Havre
Kingdom Builder
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Trajan
Glory to Rome
The Swarm
Race for the Galaxy
Caylus
Battlestar Galactica
Tammany Hall
Small World
Zombicide
Hawaii
Quarriors! Quarmageddon
Power Grid
Space Alert
Recommend
10 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
3 Posts

En Garde» Forums » Reviews

Subject: A short review rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Alex Brown
Australia

mb
En Garde simulates a fencing match between two competitors. Turns are broken down into movement and attacking actions on a two-dimensional board. Decisions are enabled by a shared deck of known cards (five copies each of cards 1,2,3,4, and 5). A hit wins a round, and five round wins gets the match win.

For many, fencing is something of an oddity. Its antiquated ideals and weaponry are quaint and romantic, and as such appeal to niche collectives. Knizia’s games are said to lack theme; instead En Garde focuses it. En Garde strips away the culture of the sport and focuses solely on the contest.

A depleted deck favours the aggressor, but advancing recklessly will cost you. Parries and lunges will give you options, and you will need to assess your opponent’s chances to evade counterplay. When playing En Garde you oscillate between evaluating the state of play and anticipating how your opponent will do the same.

Familiar Knizian mechanisms are at play. The shared deck will find siblings in Lost Cities and Battleline. The En Garde deck is smaller, allowing players to more accurately approximate opposing holdings. It also means ending a round by decking is less an alternate win condition and part of the strategy as a whole.

En Garde is less popular than most of Knizia’s catalogue of quick-playing, two-player games, but I think it is a gem. It has more direct conflict than Lost Cities and gives you more control than Battleline. Knizia has distilled fencing so that it is only contest. A round will involve intense focus, but can take less than a minute to play accurately.

As someone who values interaction through contest, En Garde is recommended.

En Garde is available in hard copy and for iOS.
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Mark Saya
United States
Los Angeles
California
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Good review. I too have been a fan of this game for a long time. Its economy of means is stunning. I recently got the app version and am very happy with it though I still prefer face-to-face play.
2 
 Thumb up
0.01
 tip
 Thumb up
Alex Brown
Australia

mb
I agree. I am a big fan of stripped-back gameplay but don't like abstracts. I need reasons to break the equilibrium!

En Garde is an excellent reduction. It feels very tit-for-tat, but not in a 'take that' way, but rather a 'gotcha ' way.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.