The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Total War
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Eclipse
Mice and Mystics
Dungeon Fighter
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Lords of Waterdeep
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Libertalia
Android: Netrunner
Virgin Queen
The Lord of the Rings: Nazgul
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Dominion
Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game
Infiltration
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Among the Stars
Twilight Struggle
The Swarm
Agricola
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Goa
7 Wonders
Glory to Rome
Arkham Horror
Village
Ora et Labora
Battles of Westeros: House Baratheon Army Expansion
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Thunder Road
Trajan
Zombicide
The Castles of Burgundy
7 Wonders: Cities
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Skyline
Space Alert
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
City of Horror
Race for the Galaxy
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Kingdom Builder
Le Havre
Battlestar Galactica
Recommend
1 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
6 Posts

Catacombs» Forums » General

Subject: Comparison to Ascending Empires? rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Jeff Bello
United States

If I wanted a flicking game primarily for novelty and fun, how does this compare to Ascending Empires?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Andrew Gross
United States
Seattle
Washington
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
wetwarez wrote:
If I wanted a flicking game primarily for novelty and fun, how does this compare to Ascending Empires?


I greatly prefer Catacombs. The flicking is a much bigger part of Catacombs than it is in Ascendening Empires. Most of your time in Catacombs is spent either flicking, talking about strategy for which shot to try, or laughing/whining about the results of the previous shot. In contrast, most of the time in Ascending Empires is spent doing things like buying technology, making new ships, convincing other players to attack someone else, etc.

For me, personally, if I'm going to play a game with manual dexterity, it means I'm not in the mood for something heavier; so while the more traditional economic/negotiation elements of Ascending Empires may be well done, if I'm in the mood to enjoy those elements, I'd rather just play a game without the manual dexterity. Catacombs has strategy, but it all centers around the flicking, which just feels right to me.
5 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Michael J
United States
Folsom
California
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I agree with Andrew. Ascending Empires feels much more like a Euro with some flicking elements added on. More important than flicking is your actual tech development and troop deployment. But overall, the flicking in AE feels secondary to your strategy. Most of the time, I didn't feel like precision was that critical with my shots. The same can't be said with Catacombs, however. Every shot can be critical in Catacombs, and some shots come down to millimeters. Additionally, rebounds and positional play are far more important.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Michael Mink
United States

Idaho
Andrew is spot on. I would also add the game board/s on Catacombs are much better to play on. The puzzle piece board for Ascending Empires ends up creating edges that can disrupt gameplay.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Tyler Durden
Germany
Goettingen
Visit my blog: www.brettspielblog.net
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
my thumbsup goes to Catacombs as well. This game is all about flickering and i highly recommend to play it with more as two players
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Bryan Maxwell
United States
Burtchville
Michigan
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I prefer Ascending Empires to Catacombs, but enjoy them both. I rate AE a 9 and Catacombs an 8, so you can't go wrong as far as I'm concerned.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.