The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Mice and Mystics
Eclipse
Among the Stars
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Thunder Road
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Lords of Waterdeep
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Dungeon Fighter
Virgin Queen
Skyline
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Twilight Struggle
Dominion
Android: Netrunner
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Agricola
The Big Bang Theory: The Party Game
Total War
Arkham Horror
7 Wonders
Village
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Wrong Chemistry
The Castles of Burgundy
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Alien Frontiers
Ora et Labora
Le Havre
Kingdom Builder
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Trajan
Glory to Rome
The Swarm
Race for the Galaxy
Caylus
Battlestar Galactica
Tammany Hall
Small World
Zombicide
Hawaii
Quarriors! Quarmageddon
Power Grid
Space Alert
Recommend
 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
6 Posts

A Game of Thrones» Forums » General

Subject: How is this with three players? rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Joel Eddy
United States
Coeur d'Alene
ID
flag msg tools
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I know that it is highly recommended to play this game at maximum capacity with five players, but here is my dilemma.

I have basically two game groups.

The first group is composed of seasoned gamers at my local game store. They will try just about anything once or twice, but are often victims of the "Cult of the New", of which I am myself am also a victim, if I want to be perfectly honest. I feel like I could get one or two plays at the full five players with this group. That's great.

However, my family is my second gaming group. Now... they are by no means Gateway Gamers. They mostly like medium to heavy Euro Games, like Caylus, Belfort, Hansa Teutonica, Die Burgen von Burgund, Airlines Europe etc...

Problem is. We typically only have the three of us in my family group, but they are HUGE Game of Thrones fans.

Will we be satisfied playing this with three? All opinions are welcome!

Thanks!
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Last edited Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:29 pm (Total Number of Edits: 1)
  • Posted Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:28 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • QuickReply
    •  
    • QuickQuote
    •  
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Matt Mehlhoff
United States
Rosemount
Minnesota
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
No, you won't be satisfied playing this with 3 and even 4 can be a bit rough.

6 Players - perfect
5 Players - recommended but make the neutral areas by Martell (left out) impenetrable instead of able to be taken over
4 Players - would work but won't get the full feel for the diplomacy of it
3 Players - not recommended as the conflict won't be the same and the diplomacy would be non existent
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Joel Eddy
United States
Coeur d'Alene
ID
flag msg tools
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
LannisterGold wrote:
No, you won't be satisfied playing this with 3 and even 4 can be a bit rough.

6 Players - perfect
5 Players - recommended but make the neutral areas by Martell (left out) impenetrable instead of able to be taken over
4 Players - would work but won't get the full feel for the diplomacy of it
3 Players - not recommended as the conflict won't be the same and the diplomacy would be non existent


OK. Thanks. Means a lot considering you rate the game a 9

Thanks.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Alexandre Dupuis
Canada
Montreal
Quebec
mbmbmb
To do the game justice, I often play with 3 to 4 players since this all I can muster as players. I find it just as fun, especially when one is getting the upper hand on the other two. Alliances tend to switch faster then with more players. The mechanics are still fun and the strategy still as intense if not more since you have no allies to fall upon.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Seli L
Czech Republic

LannisterGold wrote:
No, you won't be satisfied playing this with 3 and even 4 can be a bit rough.
...
3 Players - not recommended as the conflict won't be the same and the diplomacy would be non existent


I wouldn't outright dismiss the 3-player game. There's indeed not the potential of the 5/6-player game, having to deal with 2 or with 4/5 opponents is just not the same, but I wouldn't say the diplomacy would be non-existent. If you find the right people (which your family might be, if they are huge fans and could get into the mindset of all the backstabbing and tricky politics and enjoy it), then you possibly could have a quite interesting game of trying to find the fragile balance in fighting and cooperating with the 2 other people at the same time. Meaning, if 2 people simply join against the third one and beat that played into oblivion, the game will be just a waste of time, but if everybody will try to win by using and outsmarting the other two, there is room for diplomacy and it might work.

I've never actually played the game with so few players, so don't put that much weight to what I say, there must be many games which are more suitable for 3 players, but if you like the theme and get lucky I think this one might do too. There are people who allow only table talk while playing this, who discuss only with one or two other players even if it's a 6-player game, or even who don't bother with diplomacy at all and consider this some kind of a multiplayer chess and they think it works for them *shrug*. Let me put it this way: I wouldn't buy the game I were you, but if I could try it first, I would give it a shot.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
David F
United States
Emeryville
California
flag msg tools
Set up a lot of the PBF framework for BSG, Runewars, Small World, The Devil's Castle. PBF in Gears of War, Death Angel, A Game of Thrones. Currently playing Twilight Struggle, Middle-Earth Quest and Eclipse on Vassal.
badge
I'm anal about using the right terms to describe games and have posted an alternative glossary to the inconsistent sprawl in BGG's database and lexicon that is clear, accurate and simple. I care big time about my reviews, ratings and comments.
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I have no friends with 5/6 players anyway. 3 players just means fewer enemies for me!
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.