The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Mice and Mystics
Eclipse
Among the Stars
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Thunder Road
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Lords of Waterdeep
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Dungeon Fighter
Virgin Queen
Skyline
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Twilight Struggle
Dominion
Android: Netrunner
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Agricola
The Big Bang Theory: The Party Game
Total War
Arkham Horror
7 Wonders
Village
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Wrong Chemistry
The Castles of Burgundy
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Alien Frontiers
Ora et Labora
Le Havre
Kingdom Builder
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Trajan
Glory to Rome
The Swarm
Race for the Galaxy
Caylus
Battlestar Galactica
Tammany Hall
Small World
Zombicide
Hawaii
Quarriors! Quarmageddon
Power Grid
Space Alert
Recommend
2 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
4 Posts

Frank's Zoo» Forums » General

Subject: Partnership Scoring rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Jeffrey V.
United States
NJ
Unspecified
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
Maybe I am missing something in the partnership scoring. We have played two games so far and the partnerships going into the last round don't seem to work. In the five player game, the 4th place player is paired with the 1st and the 2nd with the 5th. In both our games the 4th and 5th place players had no chance of winning since a good performances would aid those ahead of them. It was impossible to make up the points with the lions and hedgehogs. Basically, they ended up simply deciding which player ahead of them did better than the other player ahead of them. The 3rd player had a chance because his points were not shared.

Has anyone else come across this? Are we doing something wrong?
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Torsten S
United Kingdom
Milton Keynes
Bucks
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Hi Jeff

you are right, I think. It is pretty much impossible to catch up to the leading players once you are behind.

I don't think you are doing anything wrong. (Apart from taking the game to seriously, maybe? whistle )

The pairings are a great part of the game and I love introducing players to the game not telling them about the pairings and the lions and the hedgehogs. Mosquitos are difficult enough to explain to non-German speakers.

But maybe there are alternative approaches to the pairing?

* Lions and hedgehogs only count for the weaker player?
* Stronger player gets penalty if he finishes before the weaker player does - maybe then points don't get shared?
* Instead of pairing 1-4, 2-5, 3-- maybe 1-5, 2-4. 3--?
* Only pair the first and the last and have everybody else fight by themselves?

Has anybody tried?
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Gary Pressler
United States
West Lafayette
Indiana
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
In order for it to work, players need to go for the highest place they can attain. True, the fourth and fifth players are often out of range to win in the last round, but they DON'T want to be last place.

Coming in last means you have to clean up after the elephants.

colonist
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Last edited Wed Jan 4, 2012 3:26 am (Total Number of Edits: 1)
  • Posted Wed Jan 4, 2012 3:25 am
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • QuickReply
    •  
    • QuickQuote
    •  
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Jeffrey V.
United States
NJ
Unspecified
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
We are a very competitive family. We like to win...even the light-hearted games. ...And noboby in our family wants to clean up after the elephants.

My daughter was thinking of having the pairings work like this for a 5 player game. 1-2, 4-5, 3 solo. This way the last two players could work together to improve their position and always feel they have a shot. The downside would be if the first two get on a roll they could win quickly. We haven't tried it this way yet.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.