The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Mice and Mystics
Eclipse
Among the Stars
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Thunder Road
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Lords of Waterdeep
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Dungeon Fighter
Virgin Queen
Skyline
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Twilight Struggle
Dominion
Android: Netrunner
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Agricola
The Big Bang Theory: The Party Game
Total War
Arkham Horror
7 Wonders
Village
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Wrong Chemistry
The Castles of Burgundy
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Alien Frontiers
Ora et Labora
Le Havre
Kingdom Builder
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Trajan
Glory to Rome
The Swarm
Race for the Galaxy
Caylus
Battlestar Galactica
Tammany Hall
Small World
Zombicide
Hawaii
Quarriors! Quarmageddon
Power Grid
Space Alert
Recommend
 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
5 Posts

Shadows over Camelot: Merlin's Company» Forums » General

Subject: Sir Geraint just a weaker Sir Lamorak? rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Grant Lester
United States
Tulsa
Oklahoma
mb
My regular group played Merlin's Company for the first time last night, and the guy playing Sir Geraint seemed rather let down that his special power just seemed to be a weaker version of Sir Lamorak's special power. I wonder if we were playing the two knights correctly?

Sir Geraint's card reads, "During the Progression of Evil, you may discard 2 White cards in lieu of doing an evil action."

Sir Lamorak's card reads, "Any time you are about to lose 1 Life point, you may choose to discard 2 White cards instead."

We read this to mean that in addition to failed quests, performing second heoric actions, etc., Sir Lamorak could also discard 2 White cards instead of losing a Life point as his evil action since the game says "Lose 1 Life point" under the Progression of Evil options.

So what say you all, did we play it correctly and thus Sir Geraint has merely a subset of Sir Lamorak's special power?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Brian Mc Cabe
United States

Arizona
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
glester03 wrote:
My regular group played Merlin's Company for the first time last night, and the guy playing Sir Geraint seemed rather let down that his special power just seemed to be a weaker version of Sir Lamorak's special power. I wonder if we were playing the two knights correctly?

Sir Geraint's card reads, "During the Progression of Evil, you may discard 2 White cards in lieu of doing an evil action."

Sir Lamorak's card reads, "Any time you are about to lose 1 Life point, you may choose to discard 2 White cards instead."

We read this to mean that in addition to failed quests, performing second heoric actions, etc., Sir Lamorak could also discard 2 White cards instead of losing a Life point as his evil action since the game says "Lose 1 Life point" under the Progression of Evil options.

So what say you all, did we play it correctly and thus Sir Geraint has merely a subset of Sir Lamorak's special power?


They overlap somewhat, but are executed differently. Sir Geraint can discard two white cards to prevent the placing of a siege engine or drawing a Progression-of-Evil card, which can be quite nice for the knights as a whole. It doesn't help him if he's on a losing quest, which is what Sir Lamorek's spin on this special ability does. Sir Lamorek's special ability can help during the actual drawing of a Progression of Evil card, in that there is one that requires all knights to lose two life points. He cannot prevent the actual drawing of the Progression-of-Evil card, merely prevent a single life loss as a result of its text.

They're two different things with the same reward, preventing life-point loss. My opinion is that one is not really a subset of the other.

Brian



 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Grant Lester
United States
Tulsa
Oklahoma
mb
But drawing a Progression-of-Evil card is only one of your 3 progression of evil options. Why not pick the third listed option "Lose 1 Life point" but then prevent the loss by discarding 2 white cards?
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Evan Pietrangelo


msg tools
Yea grant, I had noticed the same thing... Y can't u just lose a life point and then discard 2 cards to avoid the damage as ur evil action?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Alex Eaton-Salners
United States
San Diego
California
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
According to the FAQ, their powers have different effects. Lamorak cannot use his ability when he freely chooses to lose a life point (e.g., during the Progression of Evil).

Translation of Bruno's FAQ
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Hugues Richard
Canada

mbmbmb
Quote:
Lamorak cannot use his ability when he freely chooses to lose a life point (e.g., during the Progression of Evil).


That is the correct way to play him so in fact, Sir Lomarak is totally useless except on suicide missions (which is the same) and 1-2 Morrigans. Geraint though is the top overpowered knight in this exp. box.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.