The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Total War
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Eclipse
Mice and Mystics
Dungeon Fighter
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Lords of Waterdeep
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Libertalia
Android: Netrunner
Virgin Queen
The Lord of the Rings: Nazgul
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Dominion
Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game
Infiltration
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Among the Stars
Twilight Struggle
The Swarm
Agricola
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Goa
7 Wonders
Glory to Rome
Arkham Horror
Village
Ora et Labora
Battles of Westeros: House Baratheon Army Expansion
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Thunder Road
Trajan
Zombicide
The Castles of Burgundy
7 Wonders: Cities
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Skyline
Space Alert
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
City of Horror
Race for the Galaxy
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Kingdom Builder
Le Havre
Battlestar Galactica
Recommend
 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
3 Posts

Small World: Be Not Afraid...» Forums » General

Subject: Barbarians seem weak. rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Joshua C
United States
Grove City
Ohio
mbmbmbmbmb
Am I the only one who finds the Barbarians a bit on the weak side? I balance everything again the Ratman (8 units, no downside or upside). With Barbarians you get a pretty nasty downside (no spreading your units after your turn) for just 1 more unit. Not being able to "fortify" your units leads to either playing overly defensive because you don't want to leave your areas with only 1 defender. Or the places you want to take get easily taken over.

I feel like they need 10 units, or their negative should've been weakened. Or given a small positive to offset the big negative.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Danny Mack
United States
Santa Fe Springs
California
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I feel this is coming (yet again) from the perspective that all races should be equally formidable in all situations. I don't think that was ever the intent of the designers. Some races are stronger than others; some weaker than others, and most are quite situational.

What is true of every race?
(1) How you play the Barbarians (or any other race), (2) which power they are matched up with, and (3) what opposing races they share the board with are the primary factors that will determine their point-making ability, their longevity, and their overall "strength" in any given game.

Perhaps it is helpful to think of their racial power as being "sheer numbers" and then they have a drawback--what Eric Hautemont calls a "negative power" to counter their innate strength. If you can play them strongly, and make use of their board position & special power the Barbarians can really shine. But it's true, they do cause you to think/plan differently than most other races in Small World.

Your comparison to the Ratmen is a good litmus test, just as I compare the powers to Alchemist--does this power help me make at least 2 coins per turn? If not, I should just go with boring old Alchemist. Personally I feel the Barbarians are fun to play, and fresh, because even after MANY games of Small World they still challenge me to think in order to do well with them. I welcome the challenge as part of the fun.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Paul Burton
United Kingdom
Reading
mbmbmbmbmb
They do seem to be weaker than Ratmen. Similarly, Cursed is weaker than Dragonmaster.

It all depends on the factors listed by bandit_boy7, in addition to (4) how many gold coins are on it.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.