-
I am japanse and I read japanese rule.but it is confusion.
Q1:Which is correct?
A)the player can have no ZTs placed in their territory for the remainder of the turn(Even if the ZT is immediately destroyed,the player can keep ZT free).
B)the player can have no ZTs placed in their territory for the remainder of the turn(Even if the ZT is immediately destroyed,the player can't keep ZT free).
Q2:If A is correct.what does "immediately destroyed" mean?
A)ZTs are destroyed when ZTs were placed in the player's territory.
B)ZTs are destroyed by turn's end.
-
Darrell Hanning
United States
Jacksonville
Florida
Love women in action movies and shows. It all started with Diana Rigg, in the Avengers.
-
I think you'll need to say what specific section in the rules you are referring to.
-
-
Sorry,it is written to "End Game Scenarios: 1)" 11-page of a rule.
-
Darrell Hanning
United States
Jacksonville
Florida
Love women in action movies and shows. It all started with Diana Rigg, in the Avengers.
-
The rule as stated in the English rules:
"To be ZT free the player must begin the turn with no ZTs in their territory and the player can have no ZTs placed in their territory for the remainder of the turn. (Even if the ZT is immediately destroyed.)"
What the statement means is that, in order for the game to end according to item number 1, at least one player must keep every territory of their country free of Zombie Tokens for the entire turn. Being able to eliminate ZTs after they've been placed does not count as "keeping every territory free of ZTs for the entire turn". If you have a technology that prevents them from being placed, though, that would count.
So, the rule as written in English is correct. I don't understand why the translator added that last little piece to the rule, as it does seem to confuse things.
-
-
I understood ,thank you.
I did not have confidence in my interpretation of an English rule.Therefore, I was not able to have the corroboration which is wrong in the Japanese rule. However, it turned out that the Japanese rule is wrong now.
-
|
|
Posted Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:36 am
