The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Fantastiqa
Mage Knight: Board Game
Total War
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Eclipse
Mice and Mystics
Dungeon Fighter
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Lords of Waterdeep
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Libertalia
Android: Netrunner
Virgin Queen
The Lord of the Rings: Nazgul
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Dominion
Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game
Infiltration
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Among the Stars
Twilight Struggle
The Swarm
Agricola
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Goa
7 Wonders
Glory to Rome
Arkham Horror
Village
Ora et Labora
Battles of Westeros: House Baratheon Army Expansion
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Thunder Road
Trajan
Zombicide
The Castles of Burgundy
7 Wonders: Cities
Ace of Spies
War of the Ring
Skyline
Space Alert
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
City of Horror
Race for the Galaxy
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Kingdom Builder
Le Havre
Battlestar Galactica
Recommend
2 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
7 Posts

Light Speed» Forums » Variants

Subject: Idea to prevent random card throw-down tactic rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Tom Swider
United States
Harrisburg
Pennsylvania
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I saw in some posts that some players just toss their cards down with no thought, hedging on winning based upon pure number of cards down on the table.

One way that might prevent this from happening is that in a game with 3 or 4 players, the game stops when the second to last player finishes playing all cards. Random toss could still occur but I think this would penalize the first player for doing so enough to discourage the practice.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Gary Pressler
United States
West Lafayette
Indiana
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
Years ago, when first introducing this game, a certain friend decided this was a good tactic. He'd blitz through all his cards. However, after 2 or 3 four-player games of trying this, he finally conceded that it was a bad idea.

By playing out his cards so quickly, most of the ships on the table were his own. And since he had placed them more or less randomly, he was therefore most likely to hit his own ships. His score was negative in at least a couple games. It was worth trying, but it just didn't pay off.

We love the game because it is a tough balance of making snap decisions. Overthink it, and you won't have enough ships down to compete. Think too little, and you are likely to shoot yourself right in the Peacemaker.
9 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Todd
United States
Warren
Michigan
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
This was not a problem when we played.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Freelance Police
United States
Palo Alto
California
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
The original Tom Jolly rules had you play one card at a time, rather than real time. It's more strategic.

OT, But why the ***** is the representative image the Polish cover? The game was originally published in the states with a different "cover" completely!
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Russ Williams
Poland
Wrocław
Dolny Śląsk
Avatar
mbmbmb
Sam and Max wrote:
OT, But why the ***** is the representative image the Polish cover? The game was originally published in the states with a different "cover" completely!

For the same reason that other games' representative image is also the most recent published version, not the original published version?
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Todd McCorkle
United States
Anderson
Indiana
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
GaryP wrote:
...likely to shoot yourself right in the Peacemaker.

My goal for the next month is to somehow work this quote into a conversation. laugh
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Gary Pressler
United States
West Lafayette
Indiana
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
I knew you'd appreciate that one, Todd. See you in a few weeks!
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.