Readers rejoice: I have made a geeklist!
This covers every new-to-me game I've played thus far this year, and will be updated as needed. I haven't gotten to try a massive quantity of things thus far which makes doing full on blog posts tricky. This, I figure, will allow me to write a bit more frequently without waiting for "enough games" or "enough plays" or "enough".
See you over there for opinions galore!
I put the words about games in the box and hit publish. Opinions and strong takes abound!
Archive for Demetri
12 Mar 2022
- [+] Dice rolls
19 Feb 2022
Time for me to renounce my high-falutin' games writer cred, and I shall do so with great enthusiasm.
Reign is a game that can only be explained by time travel. I suspect it tumbled off the back of a Toys R Us shelf in the year 2000, somehow slipping into a rift and arriving in the modern day. Inexplicably, it also attempts to capture the decidedly modern trend in battle royale games. The time stream is a fragile thing and I fear that this has caused irreparable damage to our timeline, but if a time traveler insisted I give them my copy of Reign to right this wrong I would only do so begrudgingly.
What I'm saying is this game is not particularly modern. Turns are simple: pick one of your pieces, walk them up to 3 spaces, then optionally pick up any power stones you've landed on and start fights with adjacent pieces. Combat is a straight up roll-off with modifier for how big your piece is (1-3). Those aforementioned stones can be spent to add a d3 to your movement or combat roll, but only if declared before taking the relevant action.
This is very nearly all of the rules with the exception of the battle royale chunk itself. Every X number of turns a slice of the board will be removed, killing everyone still on it. You get warned in advance. Vacate or die. The center of the board is safe, meaning every game culminates in the final pieces of each faction rolling for victory.
And man, I don't know what it is about this game. It's pure junk food, just scooting pieces and starting fights and chucking dice. But this is one I keep coming back to, one I always want another play of, one I choose over games that are "smarter" or "better designed" or "not purchasable for $12 at places like Kohl's".
I don't care. I like this stupid thing. Time capsule qualities aside it does have the advantage of being a functional dudes-on-a-map that plays comparatively quickly, usually 30 minutes or so minus the interactive setup phase where you drop all the stones and your aforementioned dudes one by one. That actually adds a pretty significant amount of variables to consider as you may load up a particular side of the board not knowing if it'll be there for long. Is that a strategy? I dunno, I'm not sure this game has a lot of that. But it feels like you're doing something, and it gives people something to care about. Isn't that enough?
Look, I've always played games with a focus on people first. Board games are inherently social. My favorite games, generally speaking, are the ones that serve as especially slippery social lubricant. Reign is not a BGG superuser's kind of game, but it's beer & pretzels as hell and makes the people I play with smile. And also me! It makes me smile! That's worth something, especially if that something is $12. Where a lot of modern games offer an interesting mechanical twist but lack a soul, Reign barges in half-drunk and mildly concussed just to hang out with you. It feels familiar, like it's always been on the shelf, an old favorite despite not being any of those things.
But when a game works I try not to question it too much. And Reign works.
- [+] Dice rolls
22 Jan 2022
After Shamans so thoroughly blew me away last year I wanted nothing more than to play more of Chaboussit's work. Glow is on my to-do list, but it was Tea for 2 that intrigued me the most. War: The Deckbuilder? A bonkers pitch to be certain, but if anyone could pull it off...
I liked this one quickly. The resolution really is, without a single bit of exaggeration, War. Simultaneously flip cards from your decks, higher number wins, ties go to the holder of The Flamingo. I will not elaborate on the rules much but that's vital to understand; you will crave The Flamingo. It's so simple in fact that Cindy didn't believe me at first, assuming this was a simultaneous selection game using a hand where you'd be forced to play your weak cards before picking them back up. No! It's War! Get flippin'!
And it works.
The winner of each flip either resolves the card's ability or goes shopping for new cards, but their purchase power is the difference between the two cards so it's not always a viable option. As such some turns just kind of happen, and this had me initially concerned. I spent a lot of mental energy in our first game tracking when "real" decisions were being made, looking to capitalize as much as possible.
And I lost.
Now, I wasn't upset by this. I love losing! But I was confused, intrigued. So we played it again a week or so later, and this time we did what I believe to be the correct way: drinking tea, chatting, occasionally yelling at each other when cool things happened, and making the most aggressive plays possible.
And I won.
But more importantly, I understood. Tea for 2 is the farthest thing from a heads-down 2p brain burner, it's a smirking jackass of a game that I enjoy every moment of. It's got those gamblers' high moments in spades as you try to stack powerful effects in your deck knowing that they're never guaranteed, or opt for high risk/high reward means of chasing points over sure bets, or just start killing your opponent's cards only to accidentally make their deck better by culling their trash for them. Sure not every turn has a choice, but I don't care when it plays this fast and its highs are so high.
Tf2 (not THAT TF2 though, this is a different one) is staying in our 2p rotation because it's a joy factory. Sure you could approach it seriously and optimize your every play, but why do that when you can reach out and slap your friend or partner? It's perfect in its niche, and more often than not that's exactly what we're looking for. Sure it isn't Shamans-good but vanishingly few games are; what it is is the poster child for "good-dumb", the kind of silly thing that pokes the happy buttons in your brain. Chaboussit you mad hatter, you've done it again.
- [+] Dice rolls
12 Jan 2022
As someone who unironically uses the word "rad" in conversation I need to be careful with its application. I can't quite use it to describe Radlands. Do you realize how much restraint that takes? The taglines write themselves! This is the games-writer equivalent of a day off!
But no. Radlands is just ok. I want to lead off with the opinion because I'm going to gripe a fair bit, but I want to be clear that the game is by no means bad. As far as lane battlers go you could do worse. Or better. That's kind of the problem. See, in a vacuum Radlands is perfectly fine, but as someone who plays a lot of comparable games I just don't think it does enough to justify keeping it. I'm now going to rattle off a few things that bothered me, as well as mention some other games that do those things a bit better.
Oh quick aside: don't think of this as a review. I'd need to play Radlands way more to actually review it proper. This is more an impression after a couple games and why I don't want to put in the time. There's a chance I'd warm up to it more if I did, but I don't wanna and Cindy super doesn't.
CAMPS: I like the camps in theory. 3 super powerful abilities to shape your plays? Sure! But drawing 6 and keeping 3 is far from the most interesting way to do that, and pretty often you'll end up just selecting 3 that are reasonably efficient as opposed to a cool combo. When the cool combos do show up they tend to steamroll, overpowering the normal side of the table. If there was some kind of draft or ability for players to have agency here I'd be kinder to it, but as it stands it's a bit weak.
What does it better: Constructed/psuedo constructed games. I know this is a bit apples and oranges, but even self-contained games with a construction phase make for a much more satisfying start. GKR, Imperium: The Contention, literally any LCG/CCG with identities/characters, you get the gist.
CENTRAL DECK: This is supposed to be a benefit but it doesn't feel like one. To be frank, I think the deck is boring here. The card effects are often impactful, but because of the 1-turn delay most of the time they all end up feeling muted as mitigation is readily available while damage isn't. God help you if you just don't pull damage cards, then you're in for a constant poke 'n' block while you await lucky pulls or a shuffle. It isn't even attritional, it's just kinda limp.
What does it better: Plenty. Innovation (really any Chudyk game), Time Barons, Omen, I could go on but I won't. Cards need to do things!
SETTING/THEMING: I want to be careful with this one. The presentation of Radlands is gorgeous. Incredible art, great components that only improve functionality, attractive packaging with minimal waste. With all that said, I feel absolutely zero post-apoc theming here and I'm typically someone who gets into the "story" of games very easily. Maybe this ties into the lack of splashy effects, but every card just feels like an effect on a stick and not a character. It lacks personality.
What does it better: 51st State, somehow! Despite being a resource conversion game it has an interesting arc, with each player's tableau developing and raids taking out key pieces. You feel more invested there. Also there are several ameritrash-adjacent post-apoc games but that feels like cheating.
ZONES: This is getting into the weeds a bit but did this game need so many zones? Playing it without the playmat suuuuucks. The lanes are manageable, but the event queue and raider/water tower sections feel almost vestigial (despite the queue actually being pretty cool mechanically). I'd have preferred just removing time tokens, taking an action to put a black water token into my supply for later, anything to not have 3 more zones messing with legibility. It feels like the playmats are almost required for your first games and that's a bit crap when the game most (?) people will play won't have them.
What does it better: N/A
LANES: Why can cards attack the frontmost in whatever lane regardless of where they are? Why have lanes at all then? I understand it matters for defense later in the game but it barely comes up for the first half, aside from defending whichever camp is your favorite. This is the nitpickiest of the gripes but it never stopped standing out to me that your lanes barely matter to you, only to your opponent.
What does it better: Fight for Olympus, Omen again (weird how that keeps coming up), Air Land & Sea, Schotten Totten, Summoner Wars 2nd Edition if you just want to see positioning done well as opposed to "lanes" specifically.CONCLUSION
Man I dunno, I guess I'm just disappointed. I feel a bit alone on not vibing with this like so many folks I normally see eye to eye with. I don't doubt its competitive viability and that it's been well developed, but I can't pretend I care for what's on offer here. Dang.
You disappointed with this outro? So am I! I guess mediocrity loves company. Sorry about that. Next writeup will be more exciting.
- [+] Dice rolls
07 Jan 2022
Hey! How's it going? You want yet another 2021 games writeup? Sure ya do.
This was a heck of a year. Where I was broadly not impressed with the crop from 2020 (though a 2020 game does make the list) 2021 came out swinging hard enough for both of 'em. I'm not especially interested in ranking them (ranking a set list of things is fun, arbitrarily ordering a selection of things not so much) but I'll give you some games to check out, cool?
But first, some games that I think could have made it. Not a ton to say on any of these just yet. I like them, that much is for sure, but I just haven't played them enough to give them any kind of verdict. Not even gonna tag 'em in the post so I don't bother people who care about 'em! That's how short this section will be.
Need to play more but positive first impressions:
Mechanica - I don't necessarily think this has the longest legs (or...any? do the roombas have secret legs?) but I've enjoyed my plays of it so much that I have trouble caring. Thing is, it also hasn't hit the table more than a couple times and even in those there are some tiles that seem notably dominant. We'll see!
Mind MGMT - I've played this like twice and it's probably excellent, but a game like this demands far more time than I've put in.
That Time You Killed Me - We've broken out 2/4 boxes and I like it a whole lot. Cindy isn't so hot on it but other folks I've introduced it to have found it fascinating, so I'm probably going to see the rest eventually.
G.I. JOE Deck-Building Game - I have no affection for G.I. Joe beyond the PSA dubs but I've never not enjoyed a T.C. design and this doesn't break his streak. You wouldn't know it trying to learn the game from the rulebook, but this thing plays really smoothly and offers some quality decision-making alongside some primo ameritrash flavor. Just need to see if it keeps being interesting, as well as try the harder scenario.
And hey, we still aren't starting! I also have an honorable mention, and it makes me sad.
Honorable Mention: Summoner Wars 2nd Ed.
There's an alternate timeline in which Summoner Wars 2nd Ed is my GOTY. I wouldn't go so far as to say I yearn for that timeline, but I wish I could visit sometimes. The world, or at least my current situation, just isn't conducive to giving this gem the dedication it deserves. I believe the game is worth that time, but playing it digitally just doesn't hit the same for me and without a dedicated scene to really dig deep I can't in good conscience put it on the list. Frankly it's ridiculous that it isn't, but 2021 was extremely strong. Game's good, that much I know, but it demands play I just can't seem to give it.THE ACTUAL PICKS
This is one of those games where I'd say you just have to try it to get why it's here, and to its credit the BGA implementation is really good for that purpose. Most new "filler" games tend to be dull set collection affairs with a single interesting mechanism that doesn't make it worth the 20ish minutes it demands. Happy City is better than that. I think it's the fact that you have agency at every step, filling the supply with cards of your choosing and selecting from your (often meager) options. That combined with extremely simple scoring (happy x people) helps players never lose track of what matters to the benefit of anyone else, or split down weird strategic paths and reduce the meaningful interaction. This is the kind of "filler" that can easily become a main as it's played again and again, and that's a sweet spot for me.
Lovely dexterity game that does something notably different, focusing on careful pushing of pieces over application of force or gentle placement. This has won friends everywhere I've taken it, in large part thanks to its gorgeous presentation and the moment where I hand everyone their bug's special bits. Also a fantastic spectator sport. One of the few games where "optional" asymmetry does not feel quite so optional. Reviewed here: https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2755822/kabuto-sumo-1-2-dos...
This was a great year for trick takers and this was my favorite at 2p, a niche that's extremely hard to pull off. Asymmetric scoring conditions are all this needs to offer meaningful differentiation as well as a surprisingly well integrated theme. It's a strange one-sided tug of war, easy to learn and hard to master, and always interesting no matter what's dealt. Far more than a novelty, this 2p TT has legs.
What a lovely 2p game. A little bidding, a lot of hand management, and heaps of conflict in its own reserved way. The notable gears here are twofold: not being able to play duplicate colors to areas, and your scoring conditions being determined by your choices during the game. It demands both players put some time in to really suss out how to advance their own board state without setting up their opponent, or at least how not to give them too much. Very much my kind of thing, and if you have a 2p partner who likes a good conflict I'd bet it could be your thing too.
This is the first boxed narrative game I've truly liked. Not classic ameritrash "story generators", where the tale you remember is that of the actions you took and the dice you rolled, but the more modern category of games with stories to tell in a more "choose your own adventure" kinda way. Most of them are limp and their writing doesn't help. Forgotten Waters may mostly consist of quick worker placement and skill checks, but it uses that lean framework (and a well voice-acted app that doesn't make you read at everyone for two hours) to push its narrative forward, constantly giving everyone something to care about for its entire runtime. Relentlessly charming, never completely removes its tongue from its cheek, good stuff.
If you haven't played Bullet then you haven't played anything like Bullet. That's some of the highest praise I could possibly give, but not only does it innovate, it also fully delivers on its concepts. I've played this game more than almost every other game listed here combined, in large part because it's nigh impossible to just play one game of it in a sitting. Brilliant design, I look forward to seeing where it goes with the new sets. Reviewed here: https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2685324/bullet-click-click-...
I finally got my fighting-game-card-game. I've been playing these for well over a decade, searching for the one that captures everything I love about the genre without all the hand pain. Yomi was almost there but is very much its own thing, BattleCON got a lot right but Exceed kinda limply flopped, and none of the others have ever come close. PP, using fewer components than any of its competitors, delivered an authentic adaptation like no other before it. Previewed (all of which holds as a review) here: https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2505939/pocket-paragons-pre...
I don't think I've ever had a more painful experience with games writing than when I finally, laboriously, locked out Sheepy Time so I could finally finish my GOTY writeup for PixelDie. I cannot emphasize enough how much I love this game. It deserves the limelight, and lots of it. This game has been an endless source of joy at every table we've put it on, and there have been many. I say more in the review, but seriously, Sheepy Time is one of the better board games I've had the pleasure of playing in years. Reviewed here: https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2697583/sheepy-time-sweet-d...
And then there was one. A trick taker, but only kind of. A social deduction game, but where you have no true friends. A great game? Absolutely. This one keeps mutating for our group with every play and I'm not sure it'll ever stop presenting new angles to attack from. Not much else to say here beyond that this one feels truly otherworldly, and that's worth the time. Written about here: https://boardgamegeek.com/blogpost/124713/shank
As a last note, if you're interested in some weird video games we also covered a bunch of those over at PixelDie: https://pixeldie.com/2021/12/29/the-2021-pixel-die-game-awar...
Thanks for reading! I'll be around.
- [+] Dice rolls
14 Dec 2021
Quick note, wrote another review! This was for The Loop, a rare coop that actually won me over thanks to remembering to be fun: https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2772262/loop-lets-do-time-w...
Earlier this year we played several games of Square on Sale week after week, and while we haven't played it recently (or much else to be honest, life has been busy) I wanted to put some thoughts out there.
Auctions in this are high-impact. SoS's system is fairly simple but unconventional: you can only bid once per turn, on one space, and then you set a turn 2 timer on it. When it gets back around to you it ticks down to 1. One more round, then congrats! You win the thing! But at any point in those two rounds someone can come along and outbid you, and if they do they steal the timer -where it's at-. Having a one round timer yanked out from under you feels agonizing. Sure you get all your money back, but your tempo! Your precious tempo!
Winning spaces is where your points are going to come from. Where things get spicy is the chaining. If you win a spot and there are any un-won spots between that space and another one you currently own, you get to plop squares on ALL of those. It's by far the most efficient way to get your pieces out, and since leftover squares all ding you for -1 at the end you'll want to make that happen. This is a major motivator to outbid people, even if it's expensive, because any given win could compromise your board state. The game swings back and forth constantly, repainting the blocks throughout, but losing a foothold in key areas makes swinging it in your favor particularly difficult. So it's a game of picking your battles, writing off acceptable losses, and knowing when to take a hit to stake your claim.
There are a lot of little things that I've glossed over. The way recollecting your money works (in a word, slowly), how different areas of the board lock your cash up, the initial seeding of bonus point "beans" to incentivize people playing for the center of the board. All of these matter in play, but writing about them too much distracts from the feel of the thing. Keeping your head about water, counting your rapidly dwindling dollars, evaluating the board for chain opportunities, scanning your opponents' coffers to figure out how high you need to go to get that critical spot without tossing your whole bank account at it. And all while keeping pace, maintaining tempo. Always tempo. It's a balancing act where everyone will fall off the tightrope a couple times only to bounce right back up from the net, socking an opponent on their way.
Square on Sale is just fascinating. There aren't a lot of completely deterministic games that feel this breezy without sacrificing an ounce of strategy, manage to never have a dull turn. Winning feels like you've pulled one over on everyone else, losing always comes with clear feedback in hindsight, and regardless of the result it's a good use of a game night.
- [+] Dice rolls
29 Nov 2021
Real quick aside, I've written a good amount of stuff recently and make a point of crossposting on BGG but I haven't been announcing it here lately because I don't know what "self-promotion" means. Here's some recents:
Kabuto Sumo - https://pixeldie.com/2021/09/29/kabuto-sumo-review/, https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2755822/kabuto-sumo-1-2-dos...
Cuphead: Fast Rolling Dice Game - https://pixeldie.com/2021/11/03/cuphead-fast-rolling-dice-ga... , https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2755824/cuphead-fast-rollin...
Now this, this is something special. Cards and numbers afficionados take note, this one's claims of being different are not just marketing fluff. I've never played anything quite like this and several plays have only left me wanting more.
Shamans is a fusion of trick taking and hidden roles, but it doesn't play like a social deduction game. Think of your role as an assigned bid: most players are shamans who want to follow suit and play nice, but 1-2 (depending on player count) are shadows that are looking to play off-suit and tank the hand. The game isn't a must-follow meaning you can just play whatever at any time, and every card that doesn't follow the lead moves the group closer and closer to a shadow victory.
There are, of course, some additional bits. The player who tossed in the lowest on-suit card each trick gets a token. This could let them reveal their role to the table, or help earn them additional points, or nudge the track, or even give them a knife they can use to just eliminate a player later in the hand. There's more rules to that than I feel like summarizing, but the exciting part is that if a shaman is killed the track gets shoved as far as the number of cards they're holding. This means both sides very much like knives for very different reasons, and hands often involve some amount of cold war-esque arming of weapons just to signal to the table that you mean business.
But what really makes this is that, like any trick taker, you're playing several hands. And that means the roles are also re-dealt. So instead of being stuck hiding your role for 20-30 minutes you're given the fullest extent of the excitement both genres can offer. At the end of the day the winner is the individual who hits 8 points first, not a specific "side", so it's likely you'll end up on different teams from hand to hand and need to balance helping your pals with looking out for #1. Selfishly grabbing points from tokens or bonuses can be worth more than winning a hand, especially if it means you don't have to share with your "friends".
Shamans has lodged itself in my brain like a ritual dagger. It's our group's current obsession, one that's hit the table several weeks in a row and that we are nowhere close to fully understanding, much less fatiguing on. It's the rare case of a genre mashup highlighting the strengths of all its parts, while also creating something truly original, and I'm grateful it exists.
- [+] Dice rolls
21 Nov 2021
Man. Maaaaaaaaaan. Remember when I wrote about Furnace a while back I said I adored its core mechanism but not the game around it? This is that again, but possibly even more painful. This game was announced almost 5 years ago and I have no idea why it took so long, but I guess it wasn't in development hell because this thing has problems.
Folks who've read my stuff know I love to see inventive ways of utilizing roll & move. Bayou Bash, to its credit, has an excellent one. Combinations of dice and resources are on cards, which are drafted from last place to first. This means first player is typically handed the dregs. It's a very organic, interesting way to approach rubberbanding that never feels forced like many catchup mechanisms do. Add in that the deal is players +1 so the last player also gets to burn a card for additional control and wow! That rules! Surely the actual game will too, right?
No. Wrong. Absolutely not. The enjoyability begins and ends with the draft. Turns are slow, chockablock with fussy rules and far too many triggers to resolve. Combat feels like an obligation rather than a priority. The dynamic of fans (VPs) storming the track and being vulnerable is interesting in theory, but in practice it just means everyone's score is ambiguous until the end. And perhaps most egregiously, the terrain obstacles do nothing but frustrate and potentially force turn-loss. That's not something the draft can solve either, because even if you're in last you still may not be able to unstick yourself from a crappy position without using racer abilities that may not be availed to you.
It sucks because BB is so close to doing something really cool with that core mechanism. I think some heavy house ruling and shorter tracks than the rulebook recommends could make it much more enjoyable. But there are already far better racing games, games with quick turns, games that feel more like a race and less like constantly adjusting a common ledger. I'm not going to spend more time on one that still needs work.
- [+] Dice rolls
09 Nov 2021
Abandon all Artichokes didn't make a strong first impression on me when it first came out. We tried it digitally at 2p and we moved on. Seemed fine, if unexciting, and I said as much in a GotM first impressions writeup. Fast forward over a year and it's become a go-to small box option for my friends and work groups alike. What? How? Why?
Multiplayer is what how and why. AAA (I truly love that acronym) is massively better at 3p and 4p. I suspected it would improve somewhat at more than 2p as any game that lets you freely target other players often does, but I never would have guessed to what extent. At 2p it's tit for tat, with many cards having minimized or even no effect depending on game state. But at higher player counts every single targeting choice maters, which compounds as the game careens towards its end and everyone tries to either flood their deck with enough veggies that they won't draw a 'choke or cull so hard that they couldn't draw one if they wanted to. The read 'em and weep reveal at the end of each game caps its arc exactly when it needs to, at its highest point of tension.
It also picks a prime mechanical decision from other deckbuilders that I want to highlight. Cards chosen from the garden row go directly to hand, ready to be played immediately. I prefer this method to the traditional discard and draw after a shuffle, or to the roguelike deckbuilder method of just chucking your acquisitions into a fresh shuffle where you may or may not see it for a while. It lends a tactical edge to the long-term strategic decision of what to add to your deck, and sometimes that short term choice outweighs what may be useful later. Do you take the humble Potato, tilling the top of your deck again and again to remove those pesky artichokes over time? Or the flashy Carrot, which immediately composts two of the spiky veggies for you but takes itself out as well?
I compared AAA to a salad earlier. It's an easy metaphor to use, but after many plays I've realized that's a bit off target. It's more like a cup of 11 veggie stew: unassuming, surprisingly satisfying, and a prime choice for extra helpings.
- [+] Dice rolls
29 Oct 2021
Great Plains plays like an odd mix of Kingdom Builder and some things that aren't Kingdom Builder. I'd say Go but that's just not true. It's an cute little abstract, a good entry for a 2p line that sits alongside Kosmos both in feel and in box size.
That said, not all Kosmos 2p games were created equal. And GP, while fine, is just that. Maybe I'd be warmer towards it if it didn't come from the same brains that designed Mandala, which might be a perfect game.
Mechanically it's sound. Brief placement phase of what are effectively spawn points, then Kingdom Builder-ish chaining minus the cards. Hold areas that are worth points, use tiles do do more than just put a piece down, that kind of thing. Very straightforward procedure.
And that procedure is pleasing, if not thrilling. Thanks to a randomized board the game always demands a bit of that first-play board-parsing, but not so much that you can't have coffee and a chat over it. Thing is, the most interesting moves are made early. They determine where you'll be able to fight as well as where both of you will simply stake an irreversible claim. Depending on the board this may or may not be interesting. Cindy suspects there are degenerate board configurations and I mean, probably? But it plays in 10 minutes. I find it difficult to care.
Therein lies the true problem. That lack of arc, lack of excitement, lack of sharp play unforeseen, makes GP feel a bit limp in an area abstracts can't really afford to. It's a game meant to be played over and over but not necessarily focused on. Something to do, but not something to learn. I don't think that's in any way a bad thing. You might. Cindy certainly did; I couldn't get another game of this out of her if I wanted to. And while I find it enjoyable enough, the want really isn't there.
Game is fine, though. I might even like it a bit. But good is only good and fine is only fine.
- [+] Dice rolls