Recommend
2 
 Thumb up
 Hide
3 Posts

Next War: Korea» Forums » General

Subject: Regime Change Scenario rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Alecc
United States
flag msg tools
I spent more time clipping chits than playing games
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Planning to get this scenario to the table this weekend! Am I correct that VP awarded for optional rules should count AGAINST the affected side, for purposes of PRC intervention? For instance, if I elect to use the F-22 optional rule, that should bring the PRC 10 VP closer to getting their DRM, correct?
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Mitchell Land
United States
Ballwin
Missouri
flag msg tools
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Alecc wrote:
Planning to get this scenario to the table this weekend! Am I correct that VP awarded for optional rules should count AGAINST the affected side, for purposes of PRC intervention? For instance, if I elect to use the F-22 optional rule, that should bring the PRC 10 VP closer to getting their DRM, correct?


I didn't address it specifically, so, currently it would. That, however, may change the balance significantly as it is far more likely the PRC will intervene if all optionals are taken.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Alecc
United States
flag msg tools
I spent more time clipping chits than playing games
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
At this point, I'm considering the F-22 optional and both F-35 optional. Under the current rule, that would spot the PRC a -1 DRM. Given the capabilities these aircraft represent, I think it's fair to award a DRM. We'll see how the balance goes!
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.