Recommend
1 
 Thumb up
 Hide
4 Posts

Free At Last» Forums » Rules

Subject: 7.1 in version 2.0? rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Rusty McFisticuffs
United States
Arcata
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
In 7.1, step 1 ends with, "If there is already a fr"

As you might imagine, I am somewhat confu
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Tim Stellmach
United States
Arlington
Massachusetts
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Since section 7.1 pertains to the stage where the attacker declares a target city, and since the game has "free cities" where the segregationist player is not allowed to attack, I'm assuming that "If there is already a fr" was meant to be a cross reference to section 10.0 (where the rules for free cities appear).
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Tim Stellmach
United States
Arlington
Massachusetts
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Hmmm. Also, looking at it more closely, there needs to be some clarification about how the civil rights player treats free cities (there could be reasons to still want to stage a confrontation there, for example to achieve a Freedom Event). Maybe that was here as well.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
nicola caroli
Italy
flag msg tools
mbmb
Ted Torgerson sent me an updated version of the rules. The truncated phrase is simply removed, and there is no other difference, so i guess it was just irrelevant.
1 
 Thumb up
0.25
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.