Recommend
20 
 Thumb up
 Hide
3 Posts

Silk Road» Forums » Reviews

Subject: [Review] Silk Road rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Tom Vasel
United States
Homestead
Unspecified
flag msg tools
designer
Love Games, Love 'Em!!!
badge
Check out DiceTower.com!
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I enjoy teaching ancient Chinese history to my students, if only for the fact that I don’t remember it being taught to me in high school – all I recall is talk about the Great Wall. So I was pleased to see a game that focused on the Silk Road of the Han Dynasty – one of the major trade routes of the first millennium. Silk Road (Z-man Games, 2006 – Ted Cheatham and Bruno Faidutti) was also high on my interest list if only for the combination of designers – Mr. Faidutti, who has designed some classic games such as Citadels, and Ted Cheatham, one of the biggest game enthusiasts I’ve ever met.

Upon playing the game, I was really surprised at the smooth, flowing sensation the game produced. There is none of Bruno’s classic chaos (well, maybe the thief), and it includes a good mechanic to force players to get involved, rather than take a more benign role. Silk Road is probably overpriced for the components you get, but it is a good solid game – nothing fantastic or new, but more of a nice easy-going experience. I enjoy the aspect of bidding in this version; and while I feel that replayability won’t offer too many different choices, it’s certainly a nice medium weight game for occasional play.

A map shows twenty different cities that are aligned along the Silk Road, starting from Chang’An and concluding in Antioch. Cities have one or two arrows extending towards the next city, allowing choices to be made as the caravan moves along the trail. A large token is placed in Chang’An to represent the caravan, and piles of action tiles are randomly placed on the board, with one less than the number of players placed in each city. Half of the cities are colored orange and get orange tiles; the others are purple, where the purple tiles are placed. Each player is given one gold coin (worth five silver coins) and five silver coins, three random resource cubes (white – ivory; blue – silk; yellow – jewels; brown – dried fruits; and red – spices) and a shield to hide them behind. A random player is given a caravan leader pawn and as many turn tokens as there are players, minus one. The first round is ready to begin.

In each round, starting with the player to the left of the person with the caravan leader, each player must either bid higher than the previous person or pass. Once this is done, the caravan leader can either accept the money offered by the highest bidder, giving them the token or pay the same amount to that person, giving them the token. The caravan leader then moves the caravan pawn on the board to one of the next possible cities. The player then takes one of the action tiles in that city and either utilizes the action or discards the tile, passing the caravan pawn and all of the turn tokens except one. This continues until all players but one have taken an action – leaving no action tiles on the city. The next round then begins, following the same pattern.

The action tiles are:
- Trade one specific type of good for two other specific goods (this can be done twice by the acting player.)
- Buy as many goods of a specific type as the player wants to, paying 1 silver for the first, two silver for the second, etc.
- Steal one good randomly from behind another player’s screen.
- Barterer: This tile can be kept and used in a later city, allowing the player to discard it to take two tiles and actions, keeping two players from completing an action that city.
- Switch up to two goods of any kind for two goods of a player’s choice.
- Same as above, but up to four goods
- Sell as many goods of a specific type as the person wants, receiving four silver for the first good, three for the second, two for the third, and one for every one after that.
- Crook: This tile can be kept for a later turn and allows the player to change a goods type on an action tile to a different type.
- Grand Vizier: The player who chooses this tile picks a good type. All players reveal as many of that type of cubes as they want to, with the player who has the highest receiving six silver, and the player with the second most receiving three. A cube of this type is then placed on the tile to show that the Grand Vizier can not be used for that specific type of good for the remainder of the game.

Some cities have an extra action tile imprinted onto the board. When a player chooses to go there, the first player may take that action along with one other action tile. The game continues until the caravan reaches Antioch, at which point the game ends, and all players score their points. Each silver coin is worth one point; gold coins are worth five points, cubes are worth one point, and the player with the most goods tokens in each type receives two points. The player with the most points is declared the winner!

Some comments on the game…

1.) Components: The large square box feels lighter than it looks – mostly because there really isn’t that much there – well, not enough to warrant the large box. The coins are nice wooden discs that are easy to handle and use, although there’s really not enough of them for a five or six player game; we constantly had to make change to keep from running out of silver coins and finally resorted to using the turn tokens (large orange discs) as “10” value coins. Speaking of the turn tokens, they felt a bit unnecessary; and as I said, we simply use them for money now. I also wish that the caravan leader token wasn’t the exact same large wooden token as the caravan itself – people kept grabbing the caravan token by accident. Still, the rest of the components are nice – the board is a longer thin one, the action tokens are easy to read and understand – with pictorial references that make sense, the cubes are colorful and easy to handle, and the player shields are handy to hide one’s money. My only concern is that the price seems to outweigh the components inside.

2.) Rules: There is only one sheet of rules, on both sides, and it is accurate and clear. A few details are not addressed, such as what one does when a certain amount of cubes is run out of (tough luck), and what happens in a Grand Vizier tie (hooray for everyone), but most of these are common sense and can be worked out, although they should have been included in the basic rule set. The game is much easier to teach than I expected, teenagers and adults took to it easily, and both games I’ve played have come to just over an hour.

3.) Auctions: Some folk don’t like auction games, but in Silk Road, even though the auctions are important, they aren’t tiresome and repetitive. Players can’t simply drop out of the bidding, because they may end up without an action tile! One can afford to miss one or two action tiles over the course of a game, but missing more can be disastrous. An interesting effect that occurs because of this happens when one player is being offered a bid that will drop them out of taking an action. Is the amount of the bid worth them not doing anything that turn? This decision process is my favorite part of the game and can be quite interesting later on. Controlling what city the caravan goes can change the course of the game and help yourself while hurting others. Short, important bidding is a nice addition to the game, especially when you consider the fact that you’re basically bidding away victory points. I’ve seen a bid of “5”, but never anything higher, and usually bids end up at “3”.

4.) Thief: This certainly feels like a Faidutti mechanic, as I’ve seen it in several of his other games, such as Dragon’s Gold; but it does help increase player interaction. This is good, because even though the auctions matter quite a bit to who doesn’t take a turn this round, the game still doesn’t always feel very interactive. In fact, there are some who considered the theme to be a bit listless and dull; and while I disagree, I enjoyed the trading aspect in this game. I certainly understand their point of view.

5.) Fun Factor and Trading: Players must control clever players, as trading is ALWAYS beneficial – getting two cubes for one, or four dollars for a cube you only paid one or two for. That’s a cheery feeling, and even players who lose will end up with more than they started. This, combined with the quick feel of the game (any longer and it might get monotonous) keeps the game enjoyable for me. I liked the trading aspect with the game itself, even though it would have been interesting to make deals with other players. What’s neat about Silk Road is that you can look farther ahead down the path and see which cities are coming up and plan your trading accordingly. Buying two cubes for three silver and then trading them for four cubes, which you then sell two of for seven silver, gives one a bit of satisfaction and kept the game enjoyable for me.


6.) Players: I’ve seen some that think that the six player game is too chaotic. I can understand that the three player game offers up some fairly deep strategy (it probably is the best number for Silk Road), but I just enjoyed the bidding process with six players and the slight trash talking that ensued during the process. It was enjoyable, and the chaos wasn’t as bad (I didn’t even consider it chaos!), as I’ve read.

All in all, I found Silk Road to be an enjoyable game, although I fear that it may be forgettable in the long run. It’s an interesting theme, but the theme isn’t deeply rooted enough into the gameplay to keep players’ attention for many games. Games tend to feel the same, even if they’re not, so Silk Road will remain a nice diversion for me. I won’t hesitate to bring it out for non-gamers, as it’s very understandable, and there is a bit of strategy and long term planning in the game; not to mention a reasonable time limit. It just lacks that spark of absolute fun that I’m looking for, so for now I’ll play it only occasionally.

Tom Vasel
“Real men play board games”
www.thedicetower.com
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
David Molnar
United States
Ridgewood
New Jersey
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
TomVasel wrote:

3.) Auctions: Some folk don’t like auction games, but in Silk Road, even though the auctions are important, they aren’t tiresome and repetitive. Players can’t simply drop out of the bidding, because they may end up without an action tile! One can afford to miss one or two action tiles over the course of a game, but missing more can be disastrous. An interesting effect that occurs because of this happens when one player is being offered a bid that will drop them out of taking an action. Is the amount of the bid worth them not doing anything that turn? This decision process is my favorite part of the game and can be quite interesting later on. Controlling what city the caravan goes can change the course of the game and help yourself while hurting others. Short, important bidding is a nice addition to the game, especially when you consider the fact that you’re basically bidding away victory points. I’ve seen a bid of “5”, but never anything higher, and usually bids end up at “3”.



Tom-
I've only played once, but I'm not sure this is true. In our game, the runaway winner was the player who had consistently been denied an action, who had consequently been able to collect quite a bit of money from the bidding round. My daughter, who nobody had wanted to shortchange an action, did relatively poorly. Although I wonder if our bids weren't on the high side - we had quite a few “5”s.

David
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Guy Riessen
United States
Sebastopol
California
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
After a number of games-played, we've found the auction mechanic to be one of the most tense and interesting parts of the game. It requires keeping track of players' money and potential collections, and bidding is used to make a leader "pay" to get the action they want. After the first game, we've never had a 5 bid, with 3 bids being the most common. Additionally the bidding is used to get some cash for something you don't really want anyway, simply because you know the current Caravan leader really needs that next action--it allows you to get an effortless 3 or 4 silver, and at the same time, perhaps hold a leader back a little. A very nice mechanic actually, which gets more interesting with more play.

I'll say also that playing several times in reasonably close time-proximity gets a nice meta-game going--as players begin to second-guess bids and true desires based on past games. This is an interesting mechanic as well that you will miss if you only play infrequently.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.