

Just want to validate my understanding of the rule for Brace.
Lets say my ship is attacked and I suffer one hit.
If I use my Brace defense action, it is my understanding I take 0 damage.
Damage total is reduced to half .5 rounded up to 1. Thus I am taking 0 damage.
Correct?



What? No. Damage total is reduced by half to 0.5, then rounded up to 1. Thus you are taking 1 damage.

Robb Minneman
United States Tacoma Washington
Jackasses? You let a whole column get stalled and strafed on account of a couple of jackasses? What the hell's the matter with you?

No. The rule states "damage is reduced to half, rounded up." (Emphasis mine.) That means that you would round from 1 to 0.5, and round up to 1. So using a brace token against one point of damage is useless.
It is very difficult to use damage tokens to reduce damage all the way to zero. Generally, it only happens with an evade at long range.

Chris K.
Germany Berlin Berlin

robbbbbb wrote: No. The rule states "damage is reduced to half, rounded up." (Emphasis mine.) That means that you would round from 1 to 0.5, and round up to 1. So using a brace token against one point of damage is useless.
It is very difficult to use damage tokens to reduce damage all the way to zero. Generally, it only happens with an evade at long range.
And even then only if only one point of damage was rolled, since combining Evade and brace against 2 points (from 2 dice) will still end up with 0,5 rounded up to 1.



robbbbbb wrote: No. The rule states "damage is reduced to half, rounded up." (Emphasis mine.) That means that you would round from 1 to 0.5, and round up to 1. So using a brace token against one point of damage is useless.
It is very difficult to use damage tokens to reduce damage all the way to zero. Generally, it only happens with an evade at long range.
Wow I don't know how I missed that one... the key word being "to" not "by" must have read it to quick. Thanks!



Now I'm confused. What's the difference between "to" and "by" in this context? You're reducing damage to half of its original value, which is the same as reducing it by half of its original value. (And then rounding up.)

Aaron Day
United States Texas

BoardBeard wrote: What's the difference between "to" and "by" in this context? You're reducing damage to half of its original value, which is the same as reducing it by half of its original value. (And then rounding up.) It depends on when you round up.
If original damage is 5, half the damage is 5/2 which is 2.5 which you round up to 3. Reduce the damage by 3.



Hedgehobbit wrote: BoardBeard wrote: What's the difference between "to" and "by" in this context? You're reducing damage to half of its original value, which is the same as reducing it by half of its original value. (And then rounding up.) It depends on when you round up. If original damage is 5, half the damage is 5/2 which is 2.5 which you round up to 3. Reduce the damage by 3. Oh, I think I understand what's going on. I was reading the passage as "Step 1: Reduce damage to half. Step 2: Round up." What I think you're saying, and what I now agree with, is that it's actually "Take half the damage and round it up, then reduce the damage to that amount." In the first case, it doesn't matter whether it's "by" or "to", but in the second case it does.
Although just to be clear, in your example you've used "by", which I think should be "to", yes? Reduce the damage to 3, not by 3.

Anthony Pham
United States Whittier Unspecified

Guys, you are overthinking this on the level of the kind of rules lawyering that will get you ostracized from any gaming group.
And you're also wrong.
From the rules reference:
Quote: Brace: When damage is totaled during the “Resolve Damage” step, the total is reduced to half, rounded up.
Thus, attacker totals the damage after modifying dice.
Defender uses his Brace defense token to reduce the total to half, round up.
Thus 5 total damage from an attack, halved and rounded up, is 3 damage total.
Likewise, 1 damage, halved and rounded up, is 1 damage.

Chris K.
Germany Berlin Berlin

Vanigan wrote: Guys, you are overthinking this on the level of the kind of rules lawyering that will get you ostracized from any gaming group. And you're also wrong. From the rules reference: Quote: Brace: When damage is totaled during the “Resolve Damage” step, the total is reduced to half, rounded up. Thus, attacker totals the damage after modifying dice. Defender uses his Brace defense token to reduce the total to half, round up. Thus 5 total damage from an attack, halved and rounded up, is 3 damage total. Likewise, 1 damage, halved and rounded up, is 1 damage.
As has been stated identically a number of times in the thread and is not really in dispute anymore. So maybe no reason to start flinging around accusations of being rules lawyering AND wrong.

Nick Szegedi
United States Las Vegas Nevada

Ok how about this... if you have 2 Brace tokens... can you use both one after another?
Ie:
6 Damage delt... use one token... have 3 Damage... then use another 1.5 Damage (2 rounded up)... so Take 2 Damage Total?! Is this Legal?

Jeff Alexander
United States Washington

holywolfman wrote: Ok how about this... if you have 2 Brace tokens... can you use both one after another? Not in one attack. Rules Ref., under "Defense Tokens":
• The defender cannot spend more than one defense token of each type per attack. • A defense token cannot be spent more than once during an attack.

Nick Szegedi
United States Las Vegas Nevada

Ok Thank You! Would be a nice Combo...prob too good! Lol

Rohit Nambiar
United States California

chrisdk wrote: robbbbbb wrote: No. The rule states "damage is reduced to half, rounded up." (Emphasis mine.) That means that you would round from 1 to 0.5, and round up to 1. So using a brace token against one point of damage is useless.
It is very difficult to use damage tokens to reduce damage all the way to zero. Generally, it only happens with an evade at long range. And even then only if only one point of damage was rolled, since combining Evade and brace against 2 points (from 2 dice) will still end up with 0,5 rounded up to 1.
What if the attack was at long range and you got hit with 2 points (from 2 dice). Couldn't you first do brace to bring the points down to 1, then use an evade to avoid the 1 point?

Apollo
United States Woodbridge Virginia

Evades cancel individual dice not total damage. So evade first cancels one dice of your choice then brace reduces total damage.

Allen T
United States Grand Rapids Michigan

rnambiar wrote: chrisdk wrote: robbbbbb wrote: No. The rule states "damage is reduced to half, rounded up." (Emphasis mine.) That means that you would round from 1 to 0.5, and round up to 1. So using a brace token against one point of damage is useless.
It is very difficult to use damage tokens to reduce damage all the way to zero. Generally, it only happens with an evade at long range. And even then only if only one point of damage was rolled, since combining Evade and brace against 2 points (from 2 dice) will still end up with 0,5 rounded up to 1. What if the attack was at long range and you got hit with 2 points (from 2 dice). Couldn't you first do brace to bring the points down to 1, then use an evade to avoid the 1 point?
Nope. "Brace" reduces how much damage you take, not how much is rolled. Evade would cancel 1 die, leaving you with one die showing one damage. Brace then cuts that in half rounded up, so, 1 damage.

Rohit Nambiar
United States California

monkeykins wrote: rnambiar wrote: chrisdk wrote: robbbbbb wrote: No. The rule states "damage is reduced to half, rounded up." (Emphasis mine.) That means that you would round from 1 to 0.5, and round up to 1. So using a brace token against one point of damage is useless.
It is very difficult to use damage tokens to reduce damage all the way to zero. Generally, it only happens with an evade at long range. And even then only if only one point of damage was rolled, since combining Evade and brace against 2 points (from 2 dice) will still end up with 0,5 rounded up to 1. What if the attack was at long range and you got hit with 2 points (from 2 dice). Couldn't you first do brace to bring the points down to 1, then use an evade to avoid the 1 point? Nope. "Brace" reduces how much damage you take, not how much is rolled. Evade would cancel 1 die, leaving you with one die showing one damage. Brace then cuts that in half rounded up, so, 1 damage.
imichae wrote: Evades cancel individual dice not total damage. So evade first cancels one dice of your choice then brace reduces total damage.
Got it, that makes sense, cool thanks!


