Recommend
16 
 Thumb up
 Hide
6 Posts

Eminent Domain: Microcosm» Forums » Reviews

Subject: The Boarding Kennel Reviews: Eminent Domain: Microcosm rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Boarding Kennel Mike
United Kingdom
London
flag msg tools
badge
mbmbmbmb
Hello! This is a review from The Boarding Kennel - you can find the original piece and loads more board game bits at www.the-boarding-kennel.com

Please thumb if you found it helpful, or interesting, or it made you chuckle, that sort of thing




As I write this something truly spectacular is happening in what some scientists call the 'Solar System'. A tiny, carefully crafted package launched into the freezing blackness of space nine years ago has completed an epic journey to Pluto, whizzing past it at 14km per second and snapping pictures along the way. Smartly designed, small-scale, attempting to achieve something greater than the sum of its parts - surely this can't be a segue into something about board gameohhh my god here it comes:

Space-based civilisation-building card game Eminent Domain was a stellar success when it launched onto Kickstarter five years ago, rocketing to more than twice its initial $20,000 target by the end of the campaign. The self-billed "Next Evolution of Deck Building Games" took the base mechanic of players jostling to add increasingly powerful central cards to their own pools, and worked in a role-selection scheme familiar to anyone who's dabbled in games like Puerto Rico or Glory to Rome.

Fast forward a couple of years and microgames are all the rage, following the knockout success of pint-sized powerhouses such as Love Letter and Coup. Designers everywhere are turning their hands to crafting small-box games you can fire through in under 20 minutes, and Eminent Domain's Seth Jaffee was no exception.

EXCEPT FOR THE EXCEPTION

Jaffee's on record as saying he's "not a huge fan" of microgames due to their lightness and simplicity, but was tempted into the genre to see if he could cram something a bit more heavy-hitting into a similarly-sized box. Despite initially working with a classical civilisation theme, Jaffee was persuaded by publisher Tasty Minstrel Games to reskin the game to tie in with his previous product, and Eminent Domain: Microcosm was born. Expert knowledge, being used to pack more than was though possible into a tiny box? With a space theme? Microcosm might well be the New Horizons probe of board games - but is it mission accomplished, or has wedging so much into such a small package proved too great a feat of engineering?

Right, let's have a look at this sucker:



It is COMPACT. Tucked away in that tiny box are just 34 cards, with only 18 of those being used as your draw pile during the game. 18! That means just nine turns for each player before it's all over and you're counting scores, and once you've got the hang of it that 10-minute play time stamped on the front is well within reach. Like Pluto was within reach! But a bit quicker.

Yet within that 10 minutes you'll be exploring and colonising planets, launching missile-toting spaceship raids on one another, tasking boffins with researching new tech and dabbling in politics in an attempt to out-score your adversary.

Like many smart board games before it, Microcosm manages to reduce decision making for players to just a handful of options each turn, but tries to ensure each of the choices you make has a hefty impact on the rest of the game. Each turn you draw one of the three face-up Domain cards, like the ones below, or a mystery card off the top if you don't fancy any of the ones you can see. You then either play a card in your hand and discard it, or bring back your entire discard pile ready for the next turn.



That's it! The secret sauce in Microcosm is the synergy between cards - collecting lots of a single type is the key to grabbing more points at the end of the game. Wave around a handful of warfare cards, for example, will let you conquer increasingly well-protected planets, even if they've already been colonised by your opponent. Bagging a lot of research lets you grab more of the scarce, power-boosting tech cards in the middle of the table, or force your opponent to chuck theirs away. Each card has a special points-booster in the top right - netting you extra points for collecting more and more tech, or colonies, or matching a bunch of red planets from the little picture in the upper left of each card, or example. Picking up just a couple of these immediately locks you into a strong course of action for the game, but the small scale of proceedings means it's easy for each player to see what the other is trying to do and look to block it. If you're blocking your opponent, though, you're not necessarily picking up cards to boost your own nefarious scheme - it's a setup which makes Eminent Domain a nimble little puzzle which changes each time you play.



For all that, Microcosm does have its problems. First plays of games invariably take longer than suggested on the box, but our first dig into Microcosm was far, far above the ten minute mark, as we constantly stop-started to clarify things in the rules sheet. It seemed like perhaps too much actually had been crammed into the game, but with hindsight it's another problem entirely - the rules sheet is awful. As well as being overly wordy describing what must be one of the simplest mechanics in board games, it still manages to miss out or be hazy on important information, mainly around the intricacies of planets and colonies.

That's been partially fixed by TMG releasing an updated PDF of the rules clarifing those points, but I still think any microgame where you're tempted to watch a rules explanation video online is making a mistake somewhere. That fiddliness continues in the end-game scoring - the intricacies of the system mean there are a bunch of different things to count up on all your cards, which is a bit discordant when the main game is so fast-paced. None of these are dealbreakers though, and for a game coming in at under a tenner they're very much minor niggles.

So what could you buy instead? Love Letter is the obvious choice if you're hunting a microgame at the same price point which handles more than two people, and fellow micro-deck builder Star Realms looks like the simpler option if you're eyeing a similar theme with a bit less think attached. But Microcosm is a smart challenge which, if not completely out of this world, is at least on the right trajectory.

--

www.the-boarding-kennel.com

Liked this review did you? Eh? Please give it a thumb, and share it around on Facebook and Twitter and such.

Why not follow us on social media too? You can:

Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCszlpXI2hsUQOlnaxQ0JnGA
Like our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/TheBoardingKennel
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/boardingkennel_

You could also click on the hearts on our Boardgamelinks page, that would be swell: http://www.boardgamelinks.com/links/details/2303

Thanks!
19 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Boarding Kennel Mike
United Kingdom
London
flag msg tools
badge
mbmbmbmb
Naw, thanks for the thumbs everyone!
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
K Moore
United Kingdom
Haywards Heath
West Sussex
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
I agree about the scoring. It's both its most unique aspect and most frustrating aspect. I think it's been too over thought really, because you basically get points for everything. We just end our games and then go "how did you do?" "I don't know, how did you do?" "I don't know..." and then count it up and find out someone won by a point.

I think it'd have a more satisfying feel if most of the points just came from the Planets being colonised or spoiled, perhaps techs and capitals at a push as they are easier to spot. I get that you want that feeling of having lots of options but I think there are too many.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Peter Rabinowitz
United States
Columbia
New Jersey
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I think you missed the point. The point of the game is... at the end you'll have cards of different types and cards which score for those different types. The whole point of the game, it seems to me, is to look about halfway through and see I've got 4 cards which score red planets so then I'll look at how I can get more red planets. Or I've got 3 cards which score for techs so I try to get more techs. There is literally no other point to this game than to see how your scoring is going, and maybe see how you're opponent's scoring is going, and then try to maximize yours / minimize there's in the last bunch of turns.

To say there's too much scoring... the whole game is about scoring sets!
7 
 Thumb up
0.50
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Boarding Kennel Mike
United Kingdom
London
flag msg tools
badge
mbmbmbmb
Sure Peter, I get that - I just wonder that as a microgame, and with the emphasis from the designers on rapid-fire playthroughs, whether the scoring is slightly too convoluted? As I said in the review though, certainly not a dealbreaker. It's just an aspect of the game I feel could use some streamlining.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Jiryfoe Man
Australia
flag msg tools
badge
open the heart
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I'm easily put off by complexity, and this game doesn't do that for me.

It's nice to not know exactly who has won until the end and the scoring is an enjoyable aspect of the game to me.
goo goo
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.