The original rules are somewhat unclear regarding the exception for a super-block with two players having only 6:es in hand.
As to the case when 2 players lead in a 2-space lane and both have 3x6, my French rules say that, once both have passed because of that, the player whose turn comes next can play a 6. So it is the player playing first, but after both have passed one turn. I had not read that part of the sentence!
I hoped to see this change in the latest English rules, spielregel-USA21.8.pdf
, but sadly not. The situation happened to me: Original track A, clockwise, player I 5 spaces from finish line with one still hidden 6 in hand, player II besides him, also with one hidden 6 in hand, player III in turn and has to pass because he is super-blocked by I and II. (None of player I or II have passed yet to reveal their hand of 6:s).
Now it is player I in turn. Either he says Pass and (A: lets player II play his 6 and win, or B: player II also passes), or C: player I asks player II if he is also in this predicament, and since he is, player I plays his 6 and wins.
With the addition franchi mentions, it is clearly B that is the correct rule, and player I gets back in turn again and plays his 6 and wins. Without the addition franchi mentions, it is either A or C. Case A is a win for player II, who did not need to waste one round saying Pass. Case C introduce a situation where a player must ask another player what he has in hand, and that is strange.
So how does it resolve? Does the players have to explicitly say pass, or do the first player instead "negotiate" with his competitor and ask him how the situation for him is, and then determine if he must pass or if the super-block exception rule kicks in?