Recommend
69 
 Thumb up
 Hide
19 Posts

Wings for the Baron (second edition)» Forums » Reviews

Subject: Find a Copy, Find an Opportunity to Play. rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Take joy from your wins; take lessons from your losses.
United States
Davidsonville
Maryland
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmb
    So I'm reading Fortress Ameritrash one day, minding my own business, when reviewer Michael Barnes mentions a new game he's been playing about developing fighter aircraft in World War I. It's heavily historically based he says with an executive theme implementing hyperinflation, morale and the need to constantly compete against Allied aircraft technologies as well as those of your fellow players. As I'm reading I'm thinking, "holy crap, this game was designed for me." Barnes wrote "I’m really digging it, not one for everybody but I think folks that like business games or are interested in the subject matter will really like."

    Well, that's me. That's exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for in gaming (and rarely finding), and just as I'm thinking this, Barnes says, "Sag, this means you." Damn right it does. Tape a game like this to a good bottle of whiskey and I'll believe in Santa Claus again.

    But the proof of the pudding is in the eating. So I purchased a copy immediately and called in my markers with several of my gaming buddies, reserving slots for playing the game so that I could give this title the attention that Mr. Barnes' hype indicated it deserved.

    And deserve it it did, something that became apparent on my first solo play. Wings for the Baron comes with solo rules, but this first game was for learning. I wanted to play the game in the traditional way so that I would be in a position to teach with authority when I sat down with friends. So I set up three of the German aircraft manufacturers and played all three. The manufacturers are the roles that players take in the game. Each provides a minor special power that provides small differences in approach to the game, but more importantly reflect each company's strength at the beginning of the war. Thematic elements are not flourishes in this game, they're an integral part of its core concepts that can't be separated from the mechanics. I've played hundreds of titles. Never have I seen a game's theme so entwined with the gameplay, so carefully modeled in the ruleset. This game is exceptionally well thought out, by someone who has spent time reading the history of the era, the history of Germany, the history of aircraft evolution. This part of the game is flawless.

    And here's the thing with games that model history. They need to be relatively fickle. They need to have dice, or cards, or some element that simulates the lucky and unlucky breaks that each of us rolls with everyday. Like the wargames that VPG is better known for the players need to have a controlling hand over their destiny, but simple, dependable journeys are tedious. Simulations provide surprises for you to react to and this first play of mine provided three very different experiences in the three different companies I was playing. Albatros, a powerhouse manufacturer prior to the war started the game strong, earning good money with its four up-and-running factories at the beginning of the game. Fokker had to build out early and succeeded, getting a solid Fighter in the air, which is a must-have in the Standard Rules version of the game. A couple of good card pulls and a couple of good die rolls had them on Albatros' heels.

    Halberstadt was another story. In theory Halberstadt has a better R&D base. They get to draw extra cards used for design, and so should have been able to get a solid plane in the air and give the other two companies a run for their money. But Halberstadt had cursed dice, rolling nothing higher than a two turn after turn at the beginning of the game. They floundered, unable to get traction, unable to capture so much as one contract from the German government to provide aircraft for the war. Albatros and Fokker were leaving them just one opportunity in each of the early turns, and Halberstadt's dependable die roll of 1 each time meant they couldn't even land that.

    The third time something like this happens is grounds for banging your fist on the table and throwing foul language at your opponents or even the game box. But in Wings for the Baron this doesn't have to be the case. With lady luck snubbing Halberstadt I spent a moment to consider what I was doing wrong, a moment looking at the company's cards to see how I could change their fortune regardless of the cold-blooded cube on the table. The answer came in one simple word -- Design.

    The fundamental concept in Wings for the Baron is this -- build a better airplane. It's the heart of the game, and if you get a better design put together fickle dice won't have enough opportunity to get in the way of your plans. The game has three other issues that need attending: dealing with inflation eating into your revenues; building enough factories to handle the contracts you land; and gaining political influence for the bidding process. But without a solid enough aircraft to capture the German government's attention the other three issues are moot points. You can't lose money you don't have. So while it made sense for Albatros to convert its paper money to gold and to work on influencing the bid process, and made sense for Fokker to build factories to fulfill orders it was having to turn away due to lack of capacity, Halberstadt needed to spend its time taking luck out of the equation, building a world-class aircraft that would give them first pick at contract time. They didn't need factories . . . yet. They needed a plane. Two turns later Halberstadt was in the hunt, a turn after that they had the best plane in the war and suddenly couldn't handle the contracts coming their way. In spite of continuing to roll 1s, Halberstadt had an up and running concern, suddenly needing to attend to the other three issues.


Halberstadt's aircraft late in the first game. The tech tree is well filled out, an indication of dedicated effort midway through the game when it became apparent the company needed to take control of its own destiny.


    This first game playing the Standard Rules was a real eye-opener even though I was playing it solo. To a large extent the game lends itself well to solo play but I'll be honest -- I don't think I'm ever going to use the solo rules included in the rule book. A quick glance at them indicated other companies running via a different set of mechanics in an auto-pilot sort of fashion, but as a wargamer I'm accustomed to playing both sides of a battle when no opponent is available. Wings for the Baron lends itself well to this, and I thoroughly enjoyed my first playing three separate companies via the Standard Rules. I was also comfortable enough with the mechanics to teach.

    Victory Point Games has a unique look and feel to their games, boxes that look like they came from a smash-and-grab at Pappa John's with a slip cover over it. The box is designed to survive a real war and most eurogamers will be caught off guard by the unorthodox appearance. But once the pieces come out they'll be on solid ground with the thickest chits in the business. Wings for the Baron's art design includes a weathered look to the components. It gives them a war weariness that evokes the era every bit as much as the concepts being played, and the uneven worn look on the backs of the cards make the game look 100 years old. They're similar enough to not give anything away, but your eye can't help but notice the faded colors and appearance of wear, artful imperfections that make the game look different from the clean poppy artwork so common to the euro genre. VPG's laser cut on the chits adds to the flavor with dark brown edges that show themselves off when a dropped piece occasionally comes to rest on-edge. They're thick enough to do that. With muted colors and classic handwritten fonts the pieces look like they've come off a factory floor from the early 1900s.

    This is a true Euro in the classic form, thematically 100 years old but mechanically 20, using the kinds of features you find in German games from the late 1990s. Dice and cards come into play and have their effects, but you never feel out of control of your destiny. There's ways to manufacture luck if you need to (as in Halberstadt's case above.) You can get up in your opponents' business by sabotaging their designs or hiring their politically connected employees. And you can steal technologies from them, a remarkably common occurrence in aeronautics from day one. Your catch-up mechanism is scrapping for whatever is available, and if your opponents are ahead in aircraft design they become a ripe resource for your next turn. Wings for the Baron has you performing espionage before performing design, so a good turn may combine both and a lucky break on your espionage die roll can have you can build on the results of your treachery in the same turn. In most games I'm not a fan of catch-up mechs but this game gets away with it for one simple reason -- it is absolutely thematically appropriate for the game to work this way. That buys a lot of goodwill from me.

    Game two was with two seasoned gamers, but neither a wargamer by any stretch of the imagination. Both were very interested in playing because I had been calling out the game's virtues since my first play a week earlier. We played Standard Rules again, partly because I wasn't ready to teach the Advanced Rules but partly because the Standard Rules had just been so damn tight in that first play. So the three of us got down to business and got our machines humming in short order. Halfway through the game I made it a point to tell my opponents how the end-game plays out. It's not immediately apparent, but as the end of the war approaches you need to change your focus. You have to set the war aside to a certain extent. You're playing the part of a businessman not a soldier, and although Germany winning the war has its advantages to you it's not a requirement or by any means a foregone conclusion. (The rules actually mention that Germany lost the war in real life, an amusing inclusion for someone who's a history buff and leaps to the conclusion that everyone knows they went 0-2 in World Wars.) So you need to set your plane aside and tend to your money as the war reaches its conclusion. You win via cash in hand at the end, and you're getting paid in German Marks, a paper currency that lost more than 60% of its value in three years during the actual war. The currency devalues in Wings for the Baron as well, often completely but at least heavily, so there is a need to get your Paper Marks converted into gold in order to avoid inflation. That's an action too, just like Research and Design and Espionage are, so you need to decide what is most important to you each turn. As the war burns on this changes. Early in the game you need to be a player in the manufacturing game, creating a quality aircraft and having enough factory capacity to earn money. But late in the war your paper currency becomes a dodgy bet, and if the German war effort isn't going well (the actual historic outcome of the war by the way) you need to set aside your technological focus so you can spend actions to get out of the paper currency. Knowing when to turn that corner is part of the game, a part that was quite different in all my plays to date, as inflation is determined by a die roll each turn. If the currency is holding strong your Marks will pay you handsomely at the end of the game. You want to keep producing. If it's tanking you need to get out, ignoring contracts and capacity at a time when the German government is in need of your best efforts. Alas, business is business.

    This second play was a close game between the three of us, I won by a hair and had damn near built a World War II era aircraft playing as Albatros. Both my opponents were very pleased with the game and look forward to playing again.

    I managed to get another play in last night with two different guys, both of which enjoyed it as well. This time we played the "Campaign Rules" which would be more aptly named "Advanced Rules" because they add more options to a single play rather than extend across multiple sessions. A minor quibble at best. The Campaign Rules are just two very short pages, but I struggled a bit with the new markers and concepts. They are quite simple, but they add a fair chunk of overhead to the running gear of the game. When I apologized for my confusion both of my buddies made it a point to indicate that they were really enjoying the play in spite of it, so apparently this wasn't something that had a negative impact on first time players.

    But it did have an impact on me, and I'll be honest -- the Advanced Rules decouple the players from each other quite a bit. What I mean by that is that they open up a lot more space for players to do their own thing away from the influences of their opponents. This a noticeable change from the super-tight competition going on in the Standard Rules. With a couple of plays under my belt I had a little more understanding than the other two guys, so I was able to score some political influence early and build a competitive fighter craft. Factories coming on line shortly after that made me a force to be reckoned with, and in the Standard Rules my two opponents would have had to take me on directly -- out-designing me to get first picks at contracts and finding ways to generate their own political influence or take mine out. Both are options in the Standard Rules and they're a must if someone starts opening a lead. There are cards specifically designed to take shots at your competitors. But with the Advanced Rules my opponents had safe, separate viable paths to choose from, and one of the players more or less withdrew from fighter production entirely. He could fill his factories with bomber contracts instead and more or less own that part of the game all to himself. That left the third player a lucrative middle space where he could be second in line each time for the fighter contracts and then augment with reconnaissance airplane contracts to fill out his factory capacity.

    I believe "multiple paths to victory" is the technical term for this and I think it's going to appeal to some groups, those that aren't as comfortable with direct conflict. But it decouples the players in all but perhaps five player games (where there wouldn't be enough options to go around) and loosened up the play too much for my liking. In my prior two games with three you needed to compete directly in a just a few categories to remain relevant, and that meant going hunting now and again. It puts a lot more pressure on you to identify your weaknesses and address them, and to find ways to stick other players. You need to get your Jack Dempsy on in a very tight play space, and I love that kind of gaming.

    In short, I think the Basic Rules are the better game. Nothing wrong with that, and it's a testament to this game's heritage in Euroville -- a small, tight set of concepts that are in conflict with each other. This game has four which is more than most. All of them need to be tended to with care in the Standard Rules, and their mix changes as the game proceeds. That's a solid trick to pull off, and the game's positively stunning thematic integration adds to the mix. Wings for the Baron competes with tactical games like Acquire, and El Grande, and Alhambra, where you need to reassess and readjust each turn based on where your opponents are and what they've recently done.

    Granted, in a five player game with the Basic Rules you could end up in a world of hurt if your fighter isn't in the top three. Contracts run out very quickly. But falling off the lead isn't a death spiral in this game. Missing contracts one turn does not hinder your ability to get them the next, you just need to focus on different priorities to get back into a competitive position. With five players I could imagine the most effective fighter switching places every turn, which would make for a very interesting run to the finish. I have yet to play a game with five, but I'm very much looking forward to it. Euros don't capture my attention as often as they used to, but damn . . . this is one hell of a good game. You can quote me on that.

                S.



    12/09/2015 Update -- I had another play of this with the Campaign (i.e., "Advanced") Rules last night, with Sippi again at the table. With a little more understanding of how the Advanced Rules work things went more smoothly and I think both Sippi and I (our third player was new to the game) were able to play more competently and wring out the options more completely. I liked the Advanced Rules more on the second play.

    Here's the thing. The Advanced Rules really change the nature of the play. They open up your canvass, turning the game into a more modern game where there are multiple ways to score points and more options on how to proceed in general. I played Pfalz (which gets bonus actions in both versions of the rules) and I never felt like I was constrained in my action selection on any particular turn. What remained was to optimize my actions, to keep the machine running at its best, and that's a valid game.

    So with the benefit of this additional experience I think the Advanced Rules are a solid alternative to the Basic Rules, and that each presents a very different game. Two games in one package sure doesn't hurt my opinions any and I'll stand by what I have said above. My personal preference is for the Basic Rules with their very-tight binding and direct conflict, but the Advanced Rules will surely be more appealing to some players, and having the choice means this title is going to make a lot more people happy.

77 
 Thumb up
4.52
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Take joy from your wins; take lessons from your losses.
United States
Davidsonville
Maryland
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmb

    By the way, I appreciate this isn't a typical review that details the rules and shows all the pieces. If you'd like a more thorough peek at the technical aspects of the game you can view the rules here -- http://www.victorypointgames.com/fileuploader/download/downl... and they are very well written, very straightforward, very simple to understand.

             S.


13 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Alan Emrich
United States
Irvine
California
flag msg tools
designer
publisher
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
What a refreshing review!

Allow me to make a contrasting statement regarding the Campaign Game, however, based on a lot of experience playing that version of WINGS FOR THE BARON...

The sharp elbows and chicanery you enjoyed so much in the Standard game (with just Fighters) is there, you just need a different eye to discern it. Keep these three things in mind during your next Campaign Game:

1. There is neither a lot of development you can do nor money you can make (on average) in Bombers. You can make your living off them for the first few turns, max, but after that Bombers are, at best, a nice income supplement (like a second job).

2. Like Bombers, you CAN make a living with Recon planes for a while, but the advances of others come directly out of your pocket. Whenever their Recon plane is better than yours, it's going to cost you, and they have ample opportunities to improve their Recon planes and send your plans for Recon dominance crashing to the ground in flames!

3. The POLITICAL INFLUENCE gained from the best Bomber or Recon craft only pays off with your Fighter design! And remember, any fighter that is more than 10 levels off the top Fighter earns 0 contracts, so you can't just ignore your Fighters completely; you must remain competitive there to reap any big benefits.

In the Campaign Game, you still need a decent fighter, but have ways to "supplement your income" a bit and keep your factories busy (of which you will probably need a few more) when the Fighter contracts are not coming your way.

Try to have those things in mind the next time you play the Campaign Game, and realize that it has subtleties and fascinating, tight limitations of its own that all come back around to the importance of the Big Contracts for the Top Fighter.

Alan Emrich
26 
 Thumb up
0.25
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
David Boeren
United States
Marietta
Georgia
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Do you think it's worth picking this up if it will be only for solo play?

I'm kind of intuiting "no" from your review, but worth asking. I haven't really been following it because it's a multiplayer game but then you mentioned there was a solo mode so...
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Take joy from your wins; take lessons from your losses.
United States
Davidsonville
Maryland
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmb
dboeren wrote:
Do you think it's worth picking this up if it will be only for solo play?

    I do. There is an official set of rules for solo play that look sound, but I'll confess I haven't played them. I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't worth the price of purchase all on their own.

    But there's a second alternative -- playing multi-player against yourself. The order of actions in the multi-player rules make your ability to "cheat" with insider information (this is as one person playing multiple corporations like I did in the first game above) is very limited. Espionage occurs prior to design, so what's on the table at Action-Selection time is what you have to choose from. Very little hidden information in this game. Some cards let you steal an employee or sabotage a Design action, but those are few enough that they don't have too significant an impact on the nature of the game. It's very easy to step into each corporation's role as you prep their turns one after another, and then let things play out during the actions phase.

    As this type of game goes I think solo play is much more rewarding in this title than it is in most.

    That said, I think this game has a much broader appeal than you may consider. It's historic aspect could attract the wargame crowd easily, and the presentation is rich for someone with that sort of interest. It's core concept is true-euro and it's play time a very reasonable one hour, so most hobby gamers will be more than willing to give it a go and I think will really like it. This is a sheep in wolf's clothing, and a damn good sheep at that. You may be able to attract the locals to it easier than you think.

    Besides, it comes with really cool bennies like the artwork and history text. Each card is illustrated, each has a cool theme and historic details on it. There's a booklet that comes in the package describing each of the corporations as well. I made fun of the pizza box but this is a really plush package.

             S.

14 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Bill Koff
United States
Wilmington
North Carolina
flag msg tools
designer
Check out my "What's Next?" blog.
badge
mbmbmbmbmb
Thanks for the fantastic review and discussion. This title is part of my What's Next? blog, where I've asked readers to help me choose which unplayed game from my collection to try next. Your explanation and endorsement of WFTB makes me want to move it to the top of the list.
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Take joy from your wins; take lessons from your losses.
United States
Davidsonville
Maryland
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmb
spindoc wrote:
Thanks for the fantastic review and discussion. This title is part of my What's Next? blog, where I've asked readers to help me choose which unplayed game from my collection to try next. Your explanation and endorsement of WFTB makes me want to move it to the top of the list.

    Hey -- buy a banner ad buddy! This ain't no branding space!

    This is my sleeper game for 2015. I think people are going to stumble across this years from now and ask themselves how they missed it. As far as I'm concerned you're doing yourself a disservice if you wait, because there's a lot of B+ games coming out right now without sufficient development. I'd wager more than a few of those are in your glide-path. Do yourself a favor and play a game that has been properly produced and vetted.

    By the way, let's make it "WftB". That has a little more style to it.

             S.

11 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Randal Divinski
United States
Natick
Massachusetts
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Sagrilarus wrote:
there's a lot of B+ games coming out right now without sufficient development.... Do yourself a favor and play a game that has been properly produced and vetted.
Amen.
7 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
tim allen
Canada
Winnipeg
Manitoba
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Glad you like the graphics!
13 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Take joy from your wins; take lessons from your losses.
United States
Davidsonville
Maryland
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmb
TimAllen wrote:
Glad you like the graphics!

    Credit where credit is due sir. I think you captured the era nicely, and did your homework regarding what airplane designs belong on what sheets. It's nice to see things done right.

             S.
6 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Kevin Duke
United States
Wynne
Arkansas
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
If you are interested in the period and the planes, it is definitely worth having, even if you will hardly ever play with others. The layering and interaction of history is really worth it.
6 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Stephen Cappello
United States
Pasadena
MD
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mb
Sagrilarus wrote:
    *snip*

    I managed to get another play in last night with two different guys, both of which enjoyed it as well. This time we played the "Campaign Rules" which would be more aptly named "Advanced Rules" because they add more options to a single play rather than extend across multiple sessions. A minor quibble at best. The Campaign Rules are just two very short pages, but I struggled a bit with the new markers and concepts. They are quite simple, but they add a fair chunk of overhead to the running gear of the game. When I apologized for my confusion both of my buddies made it a point to indicate that they were really enjoying the play in spite of it, so apparently this wasn't something that had a negative impact on first time players.

    But it did have an impact on me, and I'll be honest -- the Advanced Rules decouple the players from each other quite a bit. What I mean by that is that they open up a lot more space for players to do their own thing away from the influences of their opponents. This a noticeable change from the super-tight competition going on in the Standard Rules. With a couple of plays under my belt I had a little more understanding than the other two guys, so I was able to score some political influence early and build a competitive fighter craft. Factories coming on line shortly after that made me a force to be reckoned with, and in the Standard Rules my two opponents would have had to take me on directly -- out-designing me to get first picks at contracts and finding ways to generate their own political influence or take mine out. Both are options in the Standard Rules and they're a must if someone starts opening a lead. There are cards specifically designed to take shots at your competitors. But with the Advanced Rules my opponents had safe, separate viable paths to choose from, and one of the players more or less withdrew from fighter production entirely. He could fill his factories with bomber contracts instead and more or less own that part of the game all to himself. That left the third player a lucrative middle space where he could be second in line each time for the fighter contracts and then augment with reconnaissance airplane contracts to fill out his factory capacity.

    *snip*

I'm one of the guys that played the *campaign version* of WftB with Sag. I'm also the one that completely dropped out of the fighter race and ended up focused solely on Bombers and Recon Planes. And I have to say, had it not been for those options, my opinion of this game would be much lower than the glowing praise that I have for it now.

In the early rounds, I did a TON of research, and my card draws were horrible. Of my first seven or so cards, I had maybe one card that I could use on my fighter. I did the two Fighter/Recons techs as early as I could, and tried rolling for Fighters, but I probably should have rolled Recon. My mistake.

Then realizing that I could dominate the Recon Track, I did so. I tried espionage to catch up on Fighter, but in the end Sag and the other guy playing with us were way ahead of me.

I then noticed that Bombers were completely untouched, and the Allies Bomber hadn't moved far at all. It was at that point that I went all in on Bombers, to salvage what was mostly a epic failure of a game on my part.

At least having those options available made the game enjoyable. It would have been a miserable slog had we been playing the *Standard* game.

Alan Emrich wrote:
*snip*

1. There is neither a lot of development you can do nor money you can make (on average) in Bombers. You can make your living off them for the first few turns, max, but after that Bombers are, at best, a nice income supplement (like a second job).

2. Like Bombers, you CAN make a living with Recon planes for a while, but the advances of others come directly out of your pocket. Whenever their Recon plane is better than yours, it's going to cost you, and they have ample opportunities to improve their Recon planes and send your plans for Recon dominance crashing to the ground in flames!

3. The POLITICAL INFLUENCE gained from the best Bomber or Recon craft only pays off with your Fighter design! And remember, any fighter that is more than 10 levels off the top Fighter earns 0 contracts, so you can't just ignore your Fighters completely; you must remain competitive there to reap any big benefits.

In the Campaign Game, you still need a decent fighter, but have ways to "supplement your income" a bit and keep your factories busy (of which you will probably need a few more) when the Fighter contracts are not coming your way.

*snip*

Alan Emrich

I realize that Bombers/Recon would never be a winning strategy, but I like the mix. I feel like keeping these points in mind would make a deeper, more complex game.

Also, for context, the score:
Sag: 50
Sippi: 19
Jere: 18

Sag killed us by having a better idea about the flow of the end game. If Jere had the experience that Sag did with the game, he would have ran away with the game.
5 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Take joy from your wins; take lessons from your losses.
United States
Davidsonville
Maryland
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmb
I scored 37 in that game.

We had hyperinflation in that game and I managed to convert 17 Marks into gold in a single turn by rolling an 18 on three sixers. I had one great patch of luck at the end.
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Stephen Cappello
United States
Pasadena
MD
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mb
Then you lied to me. I'll adjust accordingly.
7 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Danny Webb
United States
Whitesburg
Kentucky
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I need to play another game before I do my review since I read the first edition rules and developer articles right before playing and ended up conflating the two rule sets a bit, but I'm leaning toward total agreement here. The game is engaging and tightly designed. Add how much play Bountytown and Icarus have got in the group this year and the fact I really liked my first play of Conquest at Kismet, and those VPG guys are having a really good year from my point of view.
5 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Take joy from your wins; take lessons from your losses.
United States
Davidsonville
Maryland
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmb

    I have added some material to the end of the review after another play of the Advanced Rules last night. If you're on the fence it's worth a read.

    Looking forward to Sippi including some of the photos he snapped from the session.

             S.

3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Edward Uhler
United States
Commerce City
Colorado
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Great review. It is going hi on the wishlist now. Thanks for the insight!thumbsup
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Jim Marshall
United Kingdom
York
North Yorkshire
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Sagrilarus wrote:
Your catch-up mechanism is scrapping for whatever is available, and if your opponents are ahead in aircraft design they become a ripe resource for your next turn. Wings for the Baron has you performing espionage before performing design, so a good turn may combine both and a lucky break on your espionage die roll can have you can build on the results of your treachery in the same turn. In most games I'm not a fan of catch-up mechs but this game gets away with it for one simple reason -- it is absolutely thematically appropriate for the game to work this way. That buys a lot of goodwill from me.

Late to the party, but I played and thoroughly enjoyed my first game of Wings for the Baron last Saturday. My thoughts and opinions very well align with yours, as I'd hoped they would after reading your review.

As a general rule I also dislike catch-up mechanisms, but for me the espionage mechanism is WftB shines because 1. you have to invest in it, and 2. it's not guaranteed. Each espionage attempt requires one of your precious actions, and requires a successful die roll. Granted some of the die rolls are easier than others (with some being automatic in certain circumstances), but it's not a freebie.

Contrast that with (say) the catch up mechanism in Isle of Skye, a recent (and in my humble opinion, excellent) lightweight Euro. In this game you get free money at the end of each turn for every player with more points than you - 'congratulations, you've played badly, have some money as a reward!' I like the rest of the game a lot, but that makes me flinch.

Another plus for me is the simultaneous planning at the start if each turn. Sure you still have decisions to make when you come to execute an action, but having everyone plan and commit to their actions at the same time up front is a lot of fun (there will be times when predicting what the others will do is very important) and cuts downtime.

7 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
United States
Ladson
South Carolina
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Quote:
Victory Point Games has a unique look and feel to their games, boxes that look like they came from a smash-and-grab at Pappa John's with a slip cover over it.

Or a liquidation sale of a video graphics-card company. When I bought Dawn of the Zeds I was half-expecting to find components in an anti-static bag.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls