Recommend
7 
 Thumb up
 Hide
3 Posts

The Oregon Trail Card Game» Forums » Variants

Subject: Game Balance/No Elimination Variation rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
CP Face
msg tools
Two of the biggest complaints about this game seem to be the disparity in difficulty based on the number of players and players feeling uninvolved when they get eliminated. Here's an idea to kill two birds with one stone.

Alternate Setup

Write six names on the roster sheet regardless of the number of players. They can be the names of the players, friends and family, or any other random name you like. (You can write fewer names if you want a more difficult game.)

Shuffle the supply deck and deal out 20 cards among all players. Some players may receive more cards than others -- this is fine.

All other setup is the same as described in the rules.

Gameplay

All other gameplay is the same as described in the rules with the exception of what happens when a player dies.

When a player dies, they select one of the names from the roster. They erase the name and write it on a tombstone on the back of the card as normal.

That player is NOT eliminated from play. They keep all of their Supply and Trail cards and continue to use them to keep the party moving down the trail.

The game ends if the last name is erased from the roster.

This should give all parties an equal chance of conquering the trail and keep everyone in the game and participating.

Thoughts?
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Derek Whaley
New Zealand
Christchurch
flag msg tools
Darius I – 73rd Great Khan of the Illustrius Barbarian Horde, Duque San Lorenzo, Marquis de Feltón, Chief of the Zayante, Baron von Whaleyland, Lord Kennedy
badge
Arrgh!
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Just tried most of this variant and it played very well (we won! but barely – two people left but both would have died if we had played one more round). We changed one thing, though: we played with 3 players and, instead of 20 cards, we only distributed 18 since 6 * 3 Supply Cards = 18. In the end, I think this actually made the game too easy still. Simply having 6 people to kill rather than 3 probably decreases the difficulty enough. Since none of us die, there is no exchange of cards upon death, so that makes the game a tad bit more difficult, but still easier overall. In the end, though, I think we all preferred this version a lot since we all stayed in until the end and cards that cause players to skip turns have more impact.

One other potential option: instead of giving players Supply Cards at all, the cards could be pooled together. That would probably make the game too easy, but it's just a thought. I mean, in the original game, each player didn't exactly have sole access to the supplies – they are the entire party's supplies.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Shane Davies
msg tools
mbmb
Had a group of four want to give this game a try last night, so I decided to give this variant a try, and it was really easy, we only had two of the people die. I'd recommend a variant variant where if a player is to "die", that player has to discard all of his Supply cards except for two, to better emulate the death as written in the rules. Besides that, it was surely a better experience than the game was as written, just because random player elimination is so brutal.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.