Capt. Winters
Norway
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmb
Even if I don't have SoS this post is equally relevant for the SoS owners:

As an owner of AtB, AtB Solo, AtB Firefight Generator and now Guadalcanal, I 've been playing a lot and really enjoy the games. In my opinion a perfect mix between tactically depths, enough rules to make it challenging and a fast paced thriller of a game. I am also working in the editing team for the COH-series and enjoy helping out with developing these games.

I always like to analyze games to see if there are variants that could work better, or at least give game play enough variation and excitement, in certain scenarios. I believe I have found a new way to use AP, which gives a few interesting benefits. But first a summary of the different ways of using AP's:

1. Classical 7 AP per Unit; a predictable but a fair way of playing. It gives the enemy too much info about what you are able to achieve with each Unit, each turn. The upside is that it gives both sides the same amount of AP's.

2. 2D6/3D6; using two or three dices to decide what each Unit has got each turn. Gives an interesting element of randomness and therefore insecurity among the military leaders on the battlefield. The downside is that it can be too unbalanced in terms of AP given to one side. Even if statistically it will even out during a game. But I have played games where there has been big differences in AP given.

3. The fog of war; using a cup to hide the AP numbers given by method above. It really adds to the insecurity (and fear) among the players.

4. Some also has opted to use the Solo Order cards and the AP check to see if your Unit is spent. I think it can be used when playing solo both sides but I think in general it is too random and the Unit is often spent after 2-3 Ap's, which gives you too little room for actions, and therefore the tactical planning element is hurting. In the AtB Solo version playing against the AI, it works superb of course.

So, what is the new variant I have tested and found very interesting? It manages to combine number 1-3 above and also added a new tactical decision making layer, which I really enjoyed. Each Player has got 5 small pieces cut out of cardboard with one AP number written on it. I went with 5,6,7,7,and 10. In average the AP pieces has a value of 7, and this is the AP numbers a player uses when choosing his Units.

When he picks a Unit he secretly chooses one AP piece, places it close to the AP track and start to count AP from "1" and up. The enemy don't know how strong the active Unit is and thematically describes to me how strong the squad is equipped for action, this actually Round. As a commander you get the opportunity to play an active role in deciding which Unit will be better equipped than the others. "Which squad gets this extra rounds with ammo?" When all the AP is spent the player shows the opponent the chit with the AP number. Now, he knows what the other has spent and what is still left...Each AP piece must be used before you gather all 5 again and the process starts all over. When next Round starts you always start with 5 pieces again to choose from.

In play testing solo both sides it worked great and it can only be better when used in a 2-4 player game, I believe. The benefits are:

1. A fair way of using AP's since both sides has got 35 AP (7 in average), before you start all over again. You're not seeing a 3 and a 12 here which can be devastating an unbalancing a whole Round and therefore the game. A 3 is 4 times lower than 12. In my system 5 AP is the difference between the lowest and the highest AP given. I think that is enough.

2. Saves time and give faster game play without the need for constantly dice throwing and cup hidings

3. Gives the randomness and the uncertainty of fog of war.

4. Gives new dimensions of tactical decisions you as a commander have to take. "Do I equip my Marines with 10 AP or only 6, and how strong is this berserk Japanese infantry running towards me...? That's a cool new way of decision making I think.

So, I really recommend it for a try and will definitely use it more myself.

There is a similar thread on the AtB forum where this thread will continue ,so that we gather all relevant posts one place:

https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/1634191/new-and-dynamic-way...

5 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Steve Duke
United States
Georgetown
Texas
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I like it. A lot!
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Benny Bosmans
Belgium
Mechelen
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
By far I still prefer the AP spend mechanic of the solo system. Option 4.

Because this card draw gives one advantage you can't simulate with the other systems: you can re-activate a unit later in the turn.

This gives an extreme tension and push your luck factor to the game.

Perhaps in some early firefights with a small number of units, it could lead to some lucky/unlucky balance issues, but I tested this system in the KV scenario - which has a low unit count - several times along with computer play and the advantages far outweigh the negative.

The advantage of using a unit or a group of units several times in a turn makes the firefight less gamey than seeing a unit/group doing some actions and then sit as ducks beside active ones once your AP's are used up.

It is less cumbersome and adds risk/tension you can migitate with CAPs.

Of course everyone plays the way he likes best. No one is holding a gun to the head.




 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.