Alexandre P.
France
Strasbourg
France
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
From time to time I read RSP, I watch segment of Fox News or MSNBC programs or I listen to French radio programs about the USA and ... it looks/sounds as if the common opinion is that if you watch a news channel you have political propaganda and choosing the channel makes you choose for who the propaganda is made.

Is it a false impression ? Is it true only for a few channels (Fox, MSNBC, CNN ...) or are the American media considering that you can't give "news" without saying "it's [this party/candidate/politician] who is right" ?
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Leo Zappa
United States
Aliquippa
Pennsylvania
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Impartial news reporting on television has been dead in the United States since the Vietnam War, Nixon, and Watergate. Television journalism is considered entertainment programming by the networks over here.
11 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Chengkai Yang
United States
Cupertino
California
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I've found that you get a bet better from international sources, Al Jezera, DW TV, and BBC, although I also tune into the local ABC station weekly. I used to watch the PBS segments but the hours stopped working out so I can't comment on where they are in the spectrum. As others have stated, unbiased news, and reporting for the skae thereof has largely disappeared. News as entertainment has been the prevailing paradigm these days. Some days though it does feel like we're just reading the Onion.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Mac Mcleod
United States
houston
Texas
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Xahendir wrote:
From time to time I read RSP, I watch segment of Fox News or MSNBC programs or I listen to French radio programs about the USA and ... it looks/sounds as if the common opinion is that if you watch a news channel you have political propaganda and choosing the channel makes you choose for who the propaganda is made.

Is it a false impression ? Is it true only for a few channels (Fox, MSNBC, CNN ...) or are the American media considering that you can't give "news" without saying "it's [this party/candidate/politician] who is right" ?


Everything has bias, the question is how much.

Fox opinion is ridiculously biased and comprises many hours a day of their programming. Fox news varies from mildly biased to strongly biased. For example: Obama, Clinton or Michelle gives a speech, they report it but don't go live to it. Trump makes a speech, they go live to the speech. Also, Fox is slanted as well as biased. Megyn Kelly is the least biased anchor on the network and she's rational too. I'd call her a conservative independent.

Over on CNN, it's more of a tendency than a rule to do the reverse (they sometimes cover trump, they sometimes skip Clinton).

And on MSNBC, it's more the reverse. They'll always go live to Obama, Michelle, or Clinton but skip going live to Trump often. However, MSNBC slips in a lot of pro-wealthy bias ( we can't raise taxes on the wealthy because that will definitely destroy jobs!! ). MSNBC manages bias with a mixture of conservative and liberal shows.

I rarely watch ABC, CBS, or NBC any more.

Potus 124 on Sirius has strongly biased programming for all sides. It even had pro Bernie and Johnson programming.

Talk radio is almost exclusively ridiculously biased towards the right wing candidates (Jeff Bush is a RINO to them even tho he's been written up as one of our most conservative governors). NPR would be the liberal exception.

---

Does the news have to be biased or slanted?

Well, yes.

There are only 24 hours a day. 1440 minutes a day. There is more news than can be displayed so you must select what to show. Just by choosing what to show, you are going to bias the news. Do you run the story on candidate X's foibles or candidate Y's policy speech or the downsides of party Z's policies or the upsides of party K's policies? In what percentage? By trying to be balanced, you are favoring which ever side actually has a smaller following giving the illusion of false equivalency.

Then on top of that, running stories that are pro and anti a given candidate is probably going to piss off your customers so they won't want to tune in. Sending a consistent message means they'll be in a bubble unaware of bad news. So that's tricky.

You don't have to be strongly biased and you don't have to be outright slanted. I'm separating selection bias vs slanting the stories. Sometimes slanting is just agreeing with your agendda (abortion is good/bad so the candidate opposed to your view is evil)- sometimes it's purposely slanted (candidate lowers budget deficit!/candidate cuts funding for children's education). Fox has some real howlers when it comes to slanting.

--

The only thing you can do as a person is to vary your news sources. I listen to Fox, MSNBC, POTUS, talk radio. I don't often listen to NPR (inconvenient times), or the major network news shows (too many stories that don't matter like reporting a generic murder in another state- how is that relevant to me other than to give me a false impression the world is more dangerous than it is?). I read the wall street journal, IBD, slashdot, rsp, and consume various random videos from Youtube.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Lee Fisher
United States
Downingtown
PA
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Xahendir wrote:
From time to time I read RSP, I watch segment of Fox News or MSNBC programs or I listen to French radio programs about the USA and ... it looks/sounds as if the common opinion is that if you watch a news channel you have political propaganda and choosing the channel makes you choose for who the propaganda is made.

Is it a false impression ? Is it true only for a few channels (Fox, MSNBC, CNN ...) or are the American media considering that you can't give "news" without saying "it's [this party/candidate/politician] who is right" ?


Most news is local news and that's what people care about. Most Americans don't consider any political bias there.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
J.D. Hall
United States
Oklahoma
flag msg tools
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it until I get banned:

You twits keep sucking that shit up, that's what the media is going to pour down your throats. Hmmm...that's a bit more homo-erotic than I anticipated, but you get the drift.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Alexandre P.
France
Strasbourg
France
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
remorseless1 wrote:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it until I get banned:

You twits keep sucking that shit up, that's what the media is going to pour down your throats. Hmmm...that's a bit more homo-erotic than I anticipated, but you get the drift.


You are the Domionist guy, right ? Or the anti-, or the pro, or ... ?

So, what's up weirdo ?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
J.D. Hall
United States
Oklahoma
flag msg tools
Xahendir wrote:
remorseless1 wrote:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it until I get banned:

You twits keep sucking that shit up, that's what the media is going to pour down your throats. Hmmm...that's a bit more homo-erotic than I anticipated, but you get the drift.


You are the Domionist guy, right ? Or the anti-, or the pro, or ... ?

So, what's up weirdo ?

Uhm, no, I'm not the Dominionist guy. That's Steve. But I am proud to be a weirdo.

I was a newspaper journalist for 26 years. Never at a big metro, but still, ran a couple of them, was a managing editor at two others. You?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
G Rowls
msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
'I easily corrected this example of bias by simply removing the conclusory word “unsubstantiated.” '

no by removing the unsubstantiated you ligitimised the claims - he made allegations to which he supplied no proof.

Your bias is showing.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Shawn Fox
United States
Richardson
Texas
flag msg tools
Question everything.
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
remorseless1 wrote:
Xahendir wrote:
remorseless1 wrote:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it until I get banned:

You twits keep sucking that shit up, that's what the media is going to pour down your throats. Hmmm...that's a bit more homo-erotic than I anticipated, but you get the drift.


You are the Domionist guy, right ? Or the anti-, or the pro, or ... ?

So, what's up weirdo ?

Uhm, no, I'm not the Dominionist guy. That's Steve. But I am proud to be a weirdo.

I was a newspaper journalist for 26 years. Never at a big metro, but still, ran a couple of them, was a managing editor at two others. You?

How biased were you?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
J.D. Hall
United States
Oklahoma
flag msg tools
sfox wrote:
remorseless1 wrote:
Xahendir wrote:
remorseless1 wrote:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it until I get banned:

You twits keep sucking that shit up, that's what the media is going to pour down your throats. Hmmm...that's a bit more homo-erotic than I anticipated, but you get the drift.


You are the Domionist guy, right ? Or the anti-, or the pro, or ... ?

So, what's up weirdo ?

Uhm, no, I'm not the Dominionist guy. That's Steve. But I am proud to be a weirdo.

I was a newspaper journalist for 26 years. Never at a big metro, but still, ran a couple of them, was a managing editor at two others. You?

How biased were you?


Good question: I'm a centrist on most things, fiscally conservative, social liberal. But I wrote a number of stories about the lack of Republican representation in the State Legislature in the 1980s, covered the Falwellites' takeover of local GOP precincts. I got a big Democrat who was a city manager tossed out of office and I went after a Texas Democrat going for the State Senate there for making false accusations against his Republican candidate. Almost forgot -- had a OK State Speaker of the House on my ass because I printed unflattering comments made by a local Republican House member ("if you're not under his skin, you're under his thumb") and did enough follow-up the guy lost the next election. I know I have a bias, I worked hard not to let it show.

Now, my editorials were opinionated, but once I did a survey of readers when I ran a county weekly. Interestingly enough, one guy said I should go back to San Francisco with my homo liberal friends. Another one asked if I was Hitler's love child and called me a fascist. I invited both of them to coffee at a local drug store and we had a great time.

Edit: I should have added that I would estimate 70-80 percent of what I covered was not political. Speed lab busts, murder trials, school board meetings, a little old lady who bought an old house and found two grave markers in an overgrown garden, snake hunts, grade school science fairs -- those were all things I also covered.

As for what Drew said -- I was in the business. I saw what happened. I stand by my assertion.
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Robert Wesley
Nepal
Aberdeen
Washington
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mb
There is a local Regional CBS-station affiliate of whom "trend-tends" in having employed varying ethnics/gender BIAS of/with their Newscasters, based on our Governor/whatever.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
G Rowls
msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
He still made the claims and did not supply any proof , therefore the use of the word was valid.

You do however have a point that the use of claims would have been enough.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
non sequitur
United States
Elk Point
South Dakota (SD)
flag msg tools
Mandelbrot/Simurgh hybrid etc etc
badge
I made both of these fractals, hurray!
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
remorseless1 wrote:
Xahendir wrote:
remorseless1 wrote:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it until I get banned:

You twits keep sucking that shit up, that's what the media is going to pour down your throats. Hmmm...that's a bit more homo-erotic than I anticipated, but you get the drift.


You are the Domionist guy, right ? Or the anti-, or the pro, or ... ?

So, what's up weirdo ?

Uhm, no, I'm not the Dominionist guy. That's Steve. But I am proud to be a weirdo.

I was a newspaper journalist for 26 years. Never at a big metro, but still, ran a couple of them, was a managing editor at two others. You?


Psst, we're all allowed to admit we're Dominionists now.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
J.D. Hall
United States
Oklahoma
flag msg tools
Terwox wrote:
remorseless1 wrote:
Xahendir wrote:
remorseless1 wrote:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it until I get banned:

You twits keep sucking that shit up, that's what the media is going to pour down your throats. Hmmm...that's a bit more homo-erotic than I anticipated, but you get the drift.


You are the Domionist guy, right ? Or the anti-, or the pro, or ... ?

So, what's up weirdo ?

Uhm, no, I'm not the Dominionist guy. That's Steve. But I am proud to be a weirdo.

I was a newspaper journalist for 26 years. Never at a big metro, but still, ran a couple of them, was a managing editor at two others. You?


Psst, we're all allowed to admit we're Dominionists now.

Really? Thank God, keeping it a secret has been painful!!!
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
J.D. Hall
United States
Oklahoma
flag msg tools
Drew1365 wrote:
The political class is quite often literally in bed with members of the media.

No matter who wins the election, the press has, perhaps irreversibly, damaged its reputation, possibly irreversibly. I'm not sure how they gain legitimacy again unless there are purges across the board.


Dude, the "press" died at least a decade ago, maybe even longer. It got replaced with what we have now -- on a national level, it's talks shows, politics all the time, everyone's got a position and they get to scream it from their platform. On a local level, it's fluff and boring. Most of the younger set get their "news" from Facebook or Snapchat or some such nonsense that is mainly irrelevant and unimportant. It's all entertainment designed to maximize profit. There are a few real journalists out there, but they're dying out and won't be replaced. Corporate takeovers have wiped out the bed rock of journalist -- mid- and small-market dailies that did the grunt work.

Sure, the "press" panicked when web sites first popped up, and tried to make their print/broadcast product more like web sites. That was the fatal error. People will respect (and purchase) reliable, solid journalism. But corporate accountants work off the next quarter, and stock holders demand profits NOW. Compounding it was the explosion of platforms, broadcast evolved into satellite and cable, then social media applied the coup de'grace. Sadly, the vast majority of Americans like media that reinforces their world view, not a "press" that can challenge that world view. So the people like it, the stock holders make money, and the "press" dies.

By the way, the political class (mainly in Washington DC) is totally in bed with the National "press" based in DC, along with the lobbyists and donors. That's pretty much the way it always is in a national capitol. It's a big orgy where only the rest of us get fucked.

It's nice to blame "them" and "the powerful", but in reality, this is America. If the people don't want knowledge, don't want to vote, then they will get screwed in the end by their own incompetence.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
J.D. Hall
United States
Oklahoma
flag msg tools
Don't buy it. Write to advertisers and demand better quality. Start your own web site.

Don't accept what The Man is shoving up your ass.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.