He's looking real sharp in his 1940's fedora. He's got nerves of steel, an iron will, and several other metal-themed attributes. His fur is water tight and he's always up for a fight.
He's a semi-aquatic egg-laying mammal of action. He's a furry little flat-foot who'll never flinch from a fray. He's got more than just mad skills, he's got a beaver tail and a bill.
Recently I was thinking if there would be any situation where a player or a corporation would consider closing companies that are still profitable.
There was just one scenario I could think of. Suppose player A is the president of corporation X, holding just one share. Corporation X has several profitable companies. Player B also has one share of corporation X. Player A has priority over player B. Now player A closes as much as possible companies of corporation X in phase 7 and dumps his president share in phase 3, in order to hurt player B.
Would that be a realistic scenario? Has anyone ever seen this in a game? Or is this something that would never happen?
Would there be any other situation where closing profitable companies would be a realistic option?
I did it to someone once in a PBF game here but I am not convinced it was the best move for the situation. It was certainly a FUN move though!