I'm referring to the original version of the card, which allowed you to allocate the vote(s) of another player.
In our game, there were two items in the armory. Two players were present with figures. Player A (2 votes) and player B (1 vote). A uses his majority to claim the first item and then used the Weapon Replica card to make B vote for giving him the second item.
Is this possible?
I argued against it, based on the rules saying that every player in the sharing can receive a maximum of one item, no matter the votes; the winner by votes only decides who gets what:
The winner of the vote must distribute the items (cards or antidote) as they see fit, but no one can get more than an item.
Which version is correct? And if there are more items than players, can a player receive more than 1?