Recommend
19 
 Thumb up
 Hide
9 Posts

Magnifico» Forums » Reviews

Subject: Magnifico - A Child's Play Review rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Jason Meyers
United States
Central Illinois
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Quote:
A review from my experiences playing the game with children.


Magnifico(Dust Games/Spartaco Albertarelli and Angelo Zucca, 2008)
3-5 Players / 14+ / 120 minutes

1499 A.D. The foreboding Castle of Milano ominously stood sentry over the north Italian countryside. Many thought it impregnable as its monstrous walls rose to the sky, reinforced by massive towers at every corner. Its lord boasted it would never fall - even against 100,000 men. But in a rare moment that I would be foolish not to seize, the enemy emptied the castle garrison off all but eight infantry units. So I would put that declaration to the test! Gathering my armies from the surrounding lands, I march my legions of pikemen upon the fortress and begin the assault with my...

...tanks?!


What You Get:

Lots of plastic! The components are snazzy and well detailed, but a bit too small for a "dudes on a map" game, which will be fiddly by definition. Da Vinci's tanks all look like flying saucers and his planes look like hang gliders - but theming alternate history is not an exact science. The infantry are all halberd-bearing Swiss mercenary types of the Pope's Guard variety. No doubt after being mowed down by Renaissance tanks, they found employment in Papal service far safer. The mounted board is both practical and gorgeous. The cards are sturdy, linen-textured, and with appropriately baroque artwork for the time period's theme. I do wish Dust Games had provided a reference sheet describing the cards and their iconography, though. It is especially confusing for kids. It is now published by Fantasy Flight.



The Quick Rundown:

Magnifico is Ameritrash at is core with some Euro game elements. You start with one territory, two dudes, a castle, and a pile of coins. What makes this "dudes on a map" game unique is that your money is used to bid for certain project cards (all based on Leonardo da Vinci's inventions) which determine turn order, provide a variety of combat advantages, and give victory points. The usual elements of any war game are here with some unique twists. It costs money to invade other territories and wage war, plus you are limited to the number of times you can attack in one round. Grunts are free. You can only buy tanks and planes if you have one of the appropriate project cards. Attacker gets to roll first and remove casualties before the defender can fight back. However, you can also kill your own men while rolling (which I guess could simulate defensive return fire or perhaps friendly fire?). Tanks are especially fearsome as each one rolls a handful of dice and can wipe out half a dozen infantry each time - but if you roll really poorly, a major malfunction will destroy your entirearmy! Additionally, only infantry can be taken as casualties (with a few exceptions) and when all your infantry are dead, the enemy captures any remaining tanks and planes. The other major Euro element are victory points. You earn these by owning the most castles, conquering the most territories, building the most projects, and displaying Renaissance-era, pin-up models in your gym locker at the country club. After expanding and fighting and waxing and waning, eventually some one will earn enough points to be declared Magnifico, which comes with a funny hat and your own personal Swiss guard sans Popemobile.

T for Teens:

Generally, I pay little attention to the age range on the box. My kids get into a number of games even though they may be younger than that suggested. However, with Magnifico I think that 14+ is accurate. If this were the first war game introduced to my kids, I don't think they would have had as many issues. However, there are enough twists in here on old, familiar mechanics that they stumble through play and constantly ask about rule clarifications. The game is probably better suited for older children, even probably teenagers. With that said, I think some of the mechanics that threw off my children will probably also turn off some regular strategy gamers.



First off, tanks are powerful. Really powerful. My kids think they're over-powered. There are enough tank project cards in play for everyone to have one tank card. You can only own one and you need it to build them (same with planes). Which specific card you have will determine how many dice each of your tanks roll in combat and how many hits you score with a successful roll. When a tank rolls all of its dice and does not roll any explosion symbols, that is considered a complete success and you score all the hits indicated on your card, generally 4-6 (plus additional hits for any tank upgrade cards you can bid for and purchase separately). That's a lot of damage inflicted on the defender with just one tank, especially when you remember those defenders never get to even fire back! However, this advantage is tempered by several things. First, if you roll just 1 explosion, you only score half the kills allowed per your tank card and any upgrades. If you roll 2 explosions, you score 0 hits. And if you should be unlucky enough to roll 3 explosions (of which I often am), you're entire army is wiped out in a major malfunction - the "Mother of all Backfires," I suppose! You can only build one tank per turn. And if you leave yourself vulnerable to counter-attack, it is possible your tanks will be captured by the enemy and then turned against you!



The other major issue my kids have with the game is that it is very difficult to catch-up if you fall behind. Money and victory points are awarded based on owning territories, castles, and projects. It is difficult to acquire those if you don't have money; and it is difficult to get money if you don't acquire those. Fall too far behind and you don't have money to bid for projects which will generally better your combat abilities. You can turtle and build up your castle defenses making it extremely difficult to lose a territory or two, but where's the fun in that? You can't count on your infantry; they may be free, but you only get one per territory and they're weak beyond about round three. You really need tanks to be effective both on offense and even in defending strong castles. Otherwise, you're sitting and waiting for an opportunity to take advantage of two stronger neighbors weakening one or each other. By then, it can be too late to catch-up in victory points. The three attacks per turn rule is generally not enough to slow down the leader.

The castle defenses can also pose grumbling among my kids. The only real plausible defense against tanks is a castle, which then can swing the advantage to the other extreme. A castle with four towers reduces all infantry and individual tank hits by five, making assaults upon these fortresses a dicey affair. Many will think this too great a defensive advantage and encourages turtling. But turtling earns you no points. There are ways to increase your odds against these beastly cities. Planes ignore castle defenses - but there is a risk they will be destroyed in the attack. You can get the paratrooper project card which gives you're entire army a chance to ignore castle defenses - but you have to win one in an auction, pay to play it, and then roll successfully to even employ it in battle. So mostly it comes down again to the backbone of the game: tanks. The best way we've found to assault even the strongest castles is to build as many tank upgrades as possible in order to increase the number of hits each tank can score. And then bring lots of them.

I personally like Magnifico. The game gives a fresh twist to almost all the tried and true mechanics you see with "dudes on a map" games - but you may need to get used to them. Components are better than average. The theme is original and well implemented. Combat is unique. You must save money to wage war. The project bidding ensures that games vary from play to play. Planning out how best to use your menacing tanks is challenging. The tight economy, attack limitations, and unforgivingly quick combat mechanics keep turns relatively short. The victory point system prevents needless all-day slugfests.

Okay, I'll Shut Up Now:

In the end, I give Magnifico an 8 on the Geek scale (Very good game. I like to play. Probably I'll suggest it and will never turn down a game.). It is not the best choice for younger kids, though. My kids are willingto play it and it will probably grow on them over time. But the brutal and sometimes bizarre combat results, along with the "weak get weaker tendency," leaves them preferring other titles. For teens and adults, you may enjoy this one for what it is: an original and lighter war game with unique twists on the genre. If you prefer more old-school, traditional strategy games, this one may not be for you.

10 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Spartaco Albertarelli
Italy
Milano
flag msg tools
designer
mbmbmbmb
Thank you very much for you review of Magnifico. I think you are right when you say that Magnifico is not a game for kids. As a game designer I wouldn't suggest to play it with younger kids and this is the reason way we put 14+ on the box.

I really had a lot of fun reading your review. I never thought about Mona Lisa as a "pin-up girl" and this is gonna change the way I'll look at Leo's masterpiece next time I'm in Paris!
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
John McKendrick
United Kingdom
Glasgow
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Nice review - this game is now firmly on my radar ..... rats, my wallet may never forgive you

If anyone reading has both, how does it compare with Conquest of Nerath?

-John
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Jason Meyers
United States
Central Illinois
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
@Spartaco - Thank you, sir! You know, it's interesting to see how kids grasp concepts in gaming. Many times, my kids (all 10 and under) are good with games that have higher recommended ages - which leads me to think that game companies are simply being conservative. But there is also something to the age recommendation that realizes that while younger kids may graps the rules of the game, still understanding the nuanced and intricate strategies of the game is a different matter. And you can't lump all kids, or all games for that matter, together! My boys enjoy this style of game and will come to appreciate it more with time and familiarity, I'm sure.

@John - Sorry! I know the feeling! I have not played Conquest of Nerath, but here is a very nice review on it.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
John McKendrick
United Kingdom
Glasgow
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Thanks Jason ... I have Conquest of Nerath and reeaally like it

But I prefer it as a two player or two team game .... I was wondering whether this would be a better free for all game for instance?

-John
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Jason Meyers
United States
Central Illinois
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
JohnMcKendrick wrote:
Thanks Jason ... I have Conquest of Nerath and reeaally like it

But I prefer it as a two player or two team game .... I was wondering whether this would be a better free for all game for instance?

-John


Ah, oops...I see now! Sorry, can't comment, then.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Was George Orwell an Optimist?
United States
Corvallis
Oregon
flag msg tools
The Herbie Nichols Project - Dr. Cyclops' Dream
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
JohnMcKendrick wrote:
But I prefer it as a two player or two team game .... I was wondering whether this would be a better free for all game for instance?

I was mildly disappointed in my first play of Conquest of Nerath, but only because I had very high expectations. I still think it has promise, and I look forward to playing again.

I had similar high expectations for Magnifico, but was massively disappointed in my first play; so badly that I have no desire to ever play it again with the rules as published.

This could have been a brilliant game, and has design elements that appeal to me strongly, but I suspect it was ill served during development and playtesting, and what remains is in my view not worth playing. I hope to find the time some day to develop a variant.


Spielemitkinder wrote:
I think some of the mechanics that threw off my children will probably also turn off some regular strategy gamers.

I think the problems run deeper than those described by your kids, but they are dead right in identifying the tank rules as problematic.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
John McKendrick
United Kingdom
Glasgow
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Sphere was your first game of CON 2,3 or 4 player? Did you play free for all?

What are the problems with the tank rules in Magnifico?

-John
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Was George Orwell an Optimist?
United States
Corvallis
Oregon
flag msg tools
The Herbie Nichols Project - Dr. Cyclops' Dream
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
JohnMcKendrick wrote:
Sphere was your first game of CON 2,3 or 4 player? Did you play free for all?

What are the problems with the tank rules in Magnifico?

3 player free for all (session report here), followed up by a review here in which I go into detail about the elements that bothered me most.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.