Recommend
5 
 Thumb up
 Hide
3 Posts

Empire of the Sun» Forums » General

Subject: Idea behind reduced strength naval units rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Johannes Schäfer
Germany
Koblenz
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I'm curious why e.g. reduced battleships often have halve the strength of a full unit, while reduced carriers are much stronger.


Is there an idea behind this decision or is it just coincidence?
(two unequal carriers grouped together and the weaker is supposed to sink before the stronger)
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Mark Herman
United States
New York
Unspecified
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Der gluecklose Mack wrote:
I'm curious why e.g. reduced battleships often have halve the strength of a full unit, while reduced carriers are much stronger.


Is there an idea behind this decision or is it just coincidence?
(two unequal carriers grouped together and the weaker is supposed to sink before the stronger)


Most naval units represent multiple capital ships and escorts. In the case of carriers and keeping with the historical carrier battle outcomes, the flipped side for most CVs is the loss of just one carrier and no escorts. In most surface ship units it represents loss of the named capital ship and an equal slice of the escorts.

Mark
7 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Johannes Schäfer
Germany
Koblenz
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Thanks for the answer.

For sure a good idea to incorporate different battle results in the ratings.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.