Thumb up
2 Posts

Fantastiqa» Forums » Reviews

Subject: Our first play of Fantastiqa rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Phil Cray
United States
flag msg tools
Hello All:

The box arrived on Thursday and we played on Saturday.

The quality of that box and the rest of the components are really high quality. I kept commenting on how the box could be used to bludgeon (with occasional piercing) someone if needed... and that's not a comment on any mental state issues...
[It was a d&d day too]

You can see this review in full at our site:

I like it.

It's got a cute little "fantastiqal" theme that I could see children swallowing. I can acknowledge that cuteness though I boiled it down to why spatulas were somehow being used to subdue monsters of unusual size and such...

The objective is to collect a certain number of points which is based on how many people are playing and the approximate duration of game you're looking to play. One thing to note, when 4 people are playing, you're encouraged to play as 2 teams of 2 (alternate seating) so that points can be combined and the win condition is met a bit faster. We didn't quite catch that and we played a fairly lengthy individual 4-player game.

And it was still fun. Once we realized it would already be over we continued playing it individually to get a winner based on how we started.

Setup Comments
One the one hand, there are a lot of components and cards and it almost looks as if it's going to be quite a hassle to set up. On the other hand, anyone who's set up Mage Knight can get through this in a snap!

It's actually not that hard once you get a handle on the many decks of cards and notice that the card icons tell you exactly where to put the shuffled decks. There's some assembly of individual decks (the cards you start based on the chosen character image, a dog that finds you gems, a peaceful dragon which is just a waste card and a to-be-selected artifact). With some flying carpet tokens and deck reshuffling tokens you're on your way.

Game Play
You have 5 cards in your hand that are active for your turn and you can perform free actions (using a card's power which is determined by a few icons OR using flying carpet tokens to move beyond monsters w/o encountering them). Then you perform one action for your turn which is either adventuring (which means using cards to subdue a creature and move beyond it) or encountering the statue in your space or completing a quest in that space.

If adventuring, you can subdue a creature and repeat that for as many cards as you have that can subdue adjacent creatures in your path. Subduing creatures is done by matching the weapon type of your cards (top left corner) to the "subdued by" type-image(s) on the bottom of the creature (or quest) card.

Every creature subdued in this manner get added to your deck for later use and moves you ahead to the next position on the board. That adventure+move mechanic is what lets a player have a chain of subdued creatures in a single turn.

In our game, depending on what's out, some got lucky and were able to subdue 4 creatures in a turn and there were some turns where no one had the cards to subdue anything near them.

Once we got the rhythm going, we could complete turns fairly quickly without a lot of downtime in between turns.

For once, I don't believe I had any problems with this game at all. Things seemed clear and I was able to answer any questions that came up with relatively quick reviews of the rule book. That's truly a big thumb up!

Ultimately, my rating for this game is: Very Good

Why not Awesome? It's fun and I'll play this often whenever we're only a group of 4 people or fewer but it's a little kiddy to me. I'd probably rate it as Awesome if it accommodated 6 people (the size of my regular gaming group) and that might make me discover more about it... or if it were just a little more... exciting? Not sure.


My Rating Scale
Awesome: It’s fun, playable, has great art and few, if any, minor issues
Very Good: Just like awesome, only it either lacks something or there’s some issue that makes the game just a little less than awesome.
Playable (As Is): Fun, playable with decent art/mechanics with minor issues and at most 1 easily remedied major issues.
Playable (with Fixes): Potential for fun, but flawed; the game requires fixing before playing again.
OK: Not great fun, but it kills time. It might even be playable but most would ask why.
Seriously Flawed: The game is so flawed I am beside myself with how it got published at all. It is also nigh impossible to fix (or just requires way too much to fix, including the creation and printing of new cards/mechanics).
 Thumb up
  • [+] Dice rolls
Andrew MacLeod
flag msg tools
And when, exactly, are we playing Churchill again?
Thanks for the great review, Phil! I must say, though, that the "kiddiness" factor is one of the things that appeals to me about this game (as I draw ever nearer to fifty!). Then again, I do have Reepicheep as my avatar!
 Thumb up
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.