Recommend
11 
 Thumb up
 Hide
10 Posts

BoardGameGeek» Forums » Board Game Design » Board Game Design

Subject: On being wrong rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Matt Green
England
Horsham
West Sussex
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Reposted from:

http://exampleofplay.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/on-being-wrong...

__________________________________________

On being wrong


Game design is equally described as both an art and a science and I am sure there are designers coming to mind whilst you are reading this that you are mentally sifting into ‘art’ and ‘science’ pots with regard to their approach. My day job is a as a commercial scientist. I shan’t bore you with the specifics (although I could- consider this your first warning), but it will suffice to say that I have to occasionally remind non-scientists that failing to get a product or service to market is not ‘failing’ as long as we learn from the process and findings.

To quote a guy called Steve Easterbrook:

The argument that scientists should never exhibit human weaknesses is not just fallacious, it’s dangerous. It promotes the idea that science depends on perfect people to carry it out, when in fact the opposite is the case. Science is a process that compensates for the human failings of the people who engage in it, by continually questioning evidence, re-testing ideas, replicating results, collecting more data, and so on. Mistakes are made all the time. Individual scientists screw up. If they don’t make mistakes, they’re not doing worthwhile science.

Or, more succinctly:



Applied to game design this line of thinking mean that whatever you come up with might fail under testing. Which is probably why playtesting is so hard for some designers to deal with, often ignored and why Kickstarter is so popular, but I digress. A game, or mechanism within it, failing when testing is not a failure. You have not failed as a designer: you just haven’t found the right answer yet. You must be able to let a wrong answer go and be willing to replace it with a different one. that one might not be right either, but you need to at least test it.

This might go on for a while. If it doesn’t: you are not ‘doing’ design. You are, in fact, ‘doing’ self-delusion.

Here’s analogy: imagine your ideas are like puppies. Sometimes they grow into animals you are proud to share your life. Other times, due to a lack of care, they might tear your face off. Now, you could put such puppies into a sack and head for the nearest major water course, but that would be pretty cold and you would not really learn anything from it. Instead you might seek to re-home that puppy to a place where it will serve a useful function or be re-trained. Mentally though, be prepare to use the sack as a last resort.

That got pretty dark, sorry. The point is that some ideas might be a bit wild and better suited elsewhere. So park ‘em up. Have an ideas document or file for things to slot into other games or work them up at a later point.

No design is going to fly like a bird from v1.0. It’s why publishers ask for evidence that there has been at least some level of playtesting from people who aren’t blood related to you and might not be infected with the same level of crazy. It’s akin to the peer-review process in academic science in that those who choose to ignore it or subvert it are rightly treated with a bit of scepticism from those who don’t and those who have to use the information submitted. It’s an idea refinement process: others checking that you haven’t allowed you own thoughts and feeling ride roughshod over the finished article.

Don’t be afraid to make mistakes. It shows that you are well on the way to making ‘something’ worthwhile.

Games are like scientific enquiries in a lot of ways: a designer will see a gap and attempt to design into it in the same way that a scientist will develop a theory as to what is in a gap and test it. Start with the mindset that every part, every mechanism might be wrong or broken or both and if a design isn’t working then take it apart and put in some different parts of the same quality that might fill the same gap in a more elegant way. Switch, change, test, re-design, re-test and keep on questioning the results until you are certain there is no better way to make the game work to achieve what you want with it.
18 
 Thumb up
1.36
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Boaty McBoatface
England
County of Essex
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
What about
"If you make a mistake you just claim it's unobservable"?
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Matt Riddle
United States
Oxford
Michigan
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I agree, I would add "don't be afraid to punt". It hards when you spent time on a game, but if it isnt working, toss it and start over on something else.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Matt Green
England
Horsham
West Sussex
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
slatersteven wrote:
What about
"If you make a mistake you just claim it's unobservable"?


As long as it is- you're golden.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Agent J
United States
Coldwater
Michigan
flag msg tools
He's looking real sharp in his 1940's fedora. He's got nerves of steel, an iron will, and several other metal-themed attributes. His fur is water tight and he's always up for a fight.
badge
He's a semi-aquatic egg-laying mammal of action. He's a furry little flat-foot who'll never flinch from a fray. He's got more than just mad skills, he's got a beaver tail and a bill.
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
It's not really game design without killing puppies, amiright?
3 
 Thumb up
0.10
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Sithrak - The god who hates you unconditionally
Germany
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Jythier wrote:
It's not really game design without killing puppies, amiright?


So I've been gamedesignening all these years? I'm so relieved, take THAT, horrified psychologists!
6 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Sam Mercer
United Kingdom
Southampton
Hampshire
flag msg tools
designer
Avatar
mbmb
riddlen wrote:
I agree, I would add "don't be afraid to punt". It hards when you spent time on a game, but if it isnt working, toss it and start over on something else.


Great advice there Matt, did you do any of that for fleet?
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Matt Riddle
United States
Oxford
Michigan
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Cogentesque wrote:
riddlen wrote:
I agree, I would add "don't be afraid to punt". It hards when you spent time on a game, but if it isnt working, toss it and start over on something else.


Great advice there Matt, did you do any of that for fleet?


Not really at the overall lev as Fleet was our first design. There were definatly things we tried and got rid of. Lots actually I was thinking ofthe game design we have entirely abandoned mid stream since then that justwweren't working.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Ben Pinchback
United States
Leonard
Michigan
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Cogentesque wrote:
riddlen wrote:
I agree, I would add "don't be afraid to punt". It hards when you spent time on a game, but if it isnt working, toss it and start over on something else.


Great advice there Matt, did you do any of that for fleet?

From Fleet, sure. Early on the game had an additional action phase and a trade phase. Brooming both was pretty big at the time. What was left proved to be much more streamlined, focussed and balanced.
Since Fleet, we've "finished" 4 more games but bailed on over half a dozen that were half ish done but broken beyond repair or just plain not good enough. It's easy for me to leave a sub par game behind because I know if I've lost Passion for the project then it's dead. The really great games worth seeing through for me I never get bored of. Even after dozens or hundreds of plays.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Sam Mercer
United Kingdom
Southampton
Hampshire
flag msg tools
designer
Avatar
mbmb
Cool. Thats good to know, and Im impressed that you have the cold, heartless remorse needed to cull the weak! (XD)

I would (im sure we all would) be interested to read up a bit more about your started & deleted games btw. That would be great as an article, blog post, or just a post here on bgg.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.